Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE07200B78 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:05:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id ED574160AAE; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E69D160A8C for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:05:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 50791 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2016 16:05:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 50775 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2016 16:05:44 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:05:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 914FCC3AEB for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:05:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.971 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.971 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jklbo-dgi4WI for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from butterfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (butterfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.27]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 183BC5F24D for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:05:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: a2hosting|x-authuser|himself@orcmid.com Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCED204CB for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a2s42.a2hosting.com (ip-10-107-69-155.us-west-2.compute.internal [10.107.69.155]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 80DF72013B for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:05:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: a2hosting|x-authuser|himself@orcmid.com Received: from a2s42.a2hosting.com (a2s42.a2hosting.com [10.107.67.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.7.8); Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:05:34 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: a2hosting|x-authuser|himself@orcmid.com X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: a2hosting X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1472832333807:1298699830 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1472832333806 Received: from 75-165-101-25.tukw.qwest.net ([75.165.101.25]:51906 helo=Astraendo2) by a2s42.a2hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bfqyB-001bxg-5S for dev@openoffice.apache.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:05:31 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve? Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:05:29 -0700 Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <00e801d20533$d79bab20$86d30160$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQJwxwVaPIFvb056sR7d4SjvlGX+k58oyvaA Content-Language: en-us X-AuthUser: himself@orcmid.com archived-at: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:05:46 -0000 We all have these questions, Phil. What we are awaiting is someone to = provide an actionable answer. There is nothing to do about the FUD (as is already remarked elsewhere = on the What would ... thread). That's a waste of energy. What we need = is energy put into having an AOO that serves its community. Patricia and Marcus have already taken some steps and there is a call = for volunteers on the download page. =20 We need people to step up. The folks we have are already spinning more = plates than they have arms and legs. - Dennis > -----Original Message----- > From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue.fan@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 08:00 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve? >=20 > OK, counter-point to the other thread... let's talk specifically about > what > needs to happen next, given that some (plenty|most|all|???) of us want > this > project to > continue moving forward. >=20 > What has to happen next? What is the most important thing/things we > could > be > working on? What could I do *right now* to help move things in a > positive > direction? >=20 > How can we attract more developers? How do we counter the FUD that is > already being promulgated in response to the "retirement" discussion? > etc... >=20 >=20 > Phil > ~~~ > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org