Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Reply-To: <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
To: <dev@openoffice.apache.org>
References: <008d01d204a9$bd37caa0$37a75fe0$@apache.org> <d7545bdb-333b-e3c7-78a4-62fc0a0131c5@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> <d1186157-0dde-afb1-1ab1-d0bea6e74308@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de>
In-Reply-To: <d1186157-0dde-afb1-1ab1-d0bea6e74308@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 08:05:11 -0700
Organization: NuovoDoc
Message-ID: <00bf01d2052b$67b4cb00$371e6100$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQL3CsVg1t4ljsUQ5BRotOjkWiYvVwJ09WtiAnzCRk6d9KpccA==
Content-Language: en-us
archived-at: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:05:29 -0000

Also, <http://lwn.net/Articles/699047/>.

The article itself is very straightforward.  The comments wander around =
all over the place with the usual pontifications about corporate =
influence, etc.

An important point is made, by the way, over how it is that LibreOffice =
deployment is far easier than that for AOO, and also much improved.

 - Dennios

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anwalt@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 04:01
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? =
(long)
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> our discussion became public:
>=20
> http://www.linux-magazin.de/content/view/full/106599
>=20
> This shows a public interest. So "going public" seems not to =
difficult.
>=20
> Kind regards
> Michael
>=20
>=20


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org