openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <orc...@apache.org>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files
Date Fri, 04 Dec 2015 05:30:11 GMT
Carl,

Thanks for everything you are doing to provide these useful components for others.

I suggest waiting over the weekend to ensure that any and all concerns/suggestions are heard.

I don't see any reason against voting on the distribution of these as a bundle.

It would be useful to discuss exactly what it is a binding vote is expected to signify.  Are
there actions expected and anything that a voter is to confirm?

 - Dennis  

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmarcum@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 19:35
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files
> 
> I have created Maven bundles for the four Java UNO jar files previously
> released by OpenOffice.org v3.2.1.
>   juh-4.1.2-bundle.jar [1],  jurt-4.1.2-bundle.jar [2],
> ridl-4.1.2-bundle.jar [3],  unoil.jar-4.1.2-bundle.jar [4]
> 
> and additionally officebean-4.1.2-bundle.jar [5]
> 
> The jar files were copied from my installed AOO 4.1.2 program/classes
> directory.  I added META-INF/LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> Java source files used for *-4.1.2-sources.jar were copied from my
> updated working copy of trunk.
> Javadoc files used for *-4.1.2-javadoc.jar were generated from these
> sources.
> 
> ridl.jar is built from a mix of java sources and classes generated from
> IDL files during a complete office build.
> A META-INF/README file is included in the sources and javadoc jars to
> explain this.
> 
> unoil.jar is completely built from IDL generated classes during a
> complete office build.
> A META-INF/README file is included in the sources and javadoc jars to
> explain this.
> 
> These jars and the .pom files were PGP signed by me on my machine.
> 
> I was concerned about not having complete java sources and javadoc so I
> asked on the legal-discuss list.
> An answer to my question is here [6].
> 
> Maven repository guidelines [7]
> Apache Maven Publishing [8]
> 
> If all this looks okay I will call for vote on these.
> 
> Do I call for one vote on all or individually?
> 
> Thanks,
> Carl
> 
> [1]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenoffice-
> 1005/
> [2]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenoffice-
> 1006/
> [3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenoffice-
> 1007/
> [4]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenoffice-
> 1008/
> [5]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenoffice-
> 1009/
> [6]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-
> discuss/201512.mbox/%3C5660076A.8090909%40apache.org%3E
> [7] http://central.sonatype.org/pages/requirements.html
> [8] http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Mime
View raw message