Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of j_k_marshall_2004@live.com
 designates 65.55.34.15 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <COL128-W86C060EE02DADE723A321BFF940@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_7598bb42-9eb5-46e7-9435-fd35f8a490fb_"
From: Jason Marshall <j_k_marshall_2004@live.com>
To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org" <dev@openoffice.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Building query: .bootstrap
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 21:28:27 +0000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <COL128-W2203B32A2DA7A0F39168BFFF950@phx.gbl>
References: <COL128-W2203B32A2DA7A0F39168BFFF950@phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0

--_7598bb42-9eb5-46e7-9435-fd35f8a490fb_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello
=20
With reference to the query below and having examined the 'bootstrap' scrip=
t=2C I realised that the script was expecting to be able to 'cd' to a direc=
tory named 'DMAKE_4_12'=2C using the comment below:
=20
cd "$dmake_directory_name" || exit
=20
However=2C the following command in the 'bootstrap' script resulted in the =
dmake archive being extracted to a directoyr named 'dmake-DMAKE_4_12' resul=
ting in the above command failing=2C as indicated in my original e-mail bel=
ow.
=20
tar -xzf "dmake_full_package_name"
=20
Accordingly=2C I manually added the following line to the 'bootstrap' scrip=
t following the tar command=2C which renames the directory where dmake was =
extracted to=2C so allowing the script to change to the expected directory:
=20
mv dmake-DMAKE_4_12 $dmake_directory_name
=20
The workaround above is perhaps obvious when isolated as above=2C but I am =
unclear if this means that there is essentially an error in the 'bootstrap'=
 script which is included or created as part of the download of the source =
code.  Or alternatively perhaps my own specific platform (Windows 7 32 bit)=
 is causing this problem.
=20
Anyway=2C having made the change above=2C bootstrap appears to have run and=
 concluded without an error message.
=20
Kind regards
=20
Jason

=20
> From: j_k_marshall_2004@live.com
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Building query: .bootstrap
> Date: Sat=2C 4 Jul 2015 15:52:32 +0000
>=20
> Hi everyone
> =20
> I am building OpenOffice on a Windows 7 system and have got so far as suc=
cessfully running .configure.  Following this=2C I execute .bootstrap=2C bu=
t I note the following:
> =20
> * When the missing tarballs and external sources are downloaded=2C the sc=
ript seems to identify that for some of these=2C the checksum does not matc=
h that expected.  Could anyone tell me why this would occur and if this is =
an issue from a security standpoint?  I. e. is it possible that what is bei=
ng downloaded by .bootstrap is unsafe?  Also=2C is it okay to simply progre=
ss to the build anyway?
> =20
> * .bootstrap ends with the following:
> =20
> DMAKE_4_12.tar.gz exists
> epm-4.2.tar.gz exists
> making and entering C:/cygwin/tmp/aoo-4.1.1/main/solenv/wntmsci12.pro/mis=
c/build/
> unpacking /tmp/aoo-4.1.1/ext_sources/7abf18f59ca96a3d463386e6d1456138-DMA=
KE_4_12.tar.gz
> entering DMAKE_4_12
> ./bootstrap: line 100: cd: DMAKE_4_12: No such file or directory
> =20
> The message clearly tells me that a directory does not exist=2C but I wou=
ld assume that this directory would be created automatically.  Would anybod=
y know what has gone wrong here?
> =20
> Thank you for your help.
> =20
> Kind regards
> =20
> Jason
>  		 	   		 =20
 		 	   		  =

--_7598bb42-9eb5-46e7-9435-fd35f8a490fb_--