Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of simon@webmink.com designates
 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54FC3854.4040507@apache.org>
References: 
 <CAK2iWdQFE3H2d3N3Z_ddgV1J12apOA1ptyz8B1hZD_rXMAEhwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <008801d058ff$0145f0d0$03d1d270$@acm.org>
 <CAK2iWdQEpOOC4bY0e--7+Qr6uPaE9d8ZkLthkBp0ayh0QQ+hvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <00ca01d0590f$57094070$051bc150$@acm.org>
 <CAA4ffp_gSFhd-gs3Ae-LAzRCSMaAyHmV3KdVatDk9UCDkQHxKA@mail.gmail.com>
 <54FB66B5.40003@tasit.net> <54FC3854.4040507@apache.org>
From: Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 13:37:10 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAA4ffp_nx76GS79HXRPq3RjO0jWVDw8phjcP5gbb7X1Wb=GLXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: community communication versus private PMC communication, WAS:
 PMC FAQ update
To: dev <dev@openoffice.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428788effa330510c704d8

--f46d04428788effa330510c704d8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@apache.org>
wrote:

> You are suggesting a usage pattern of the private list that is far beyond
> reality.
>

I am not. I am pointing out there is no way for me to know, and that the
strong reactions to Dave's original (modest & reasonable) question as well
as other follow-ups do nothing to build trust. I believe others here have
already taken that point and I suggest letting it rest now.


> What about actually doing something?
>

That, sir, is insulting.

If you want to propose a resolution, do so, but please do not attempt to
hand out jobs. If the consensus on the list devises an alternative to Kay's
original proposal and work, I may consider volunteering and requesting the
necessary access (which I probably don't have).

S.

--f46d04428788effa330510c704d8--