openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Inappropriate "Compliance Costs"
Date Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:39:55 GMT
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Rob Weir <rob@robweir.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The page provides relevant information in a bad way (tone and wording of
> >> the above list would be OK, for example). It is by keeping it as it is
> that
> >> we play the game of haters. I'll propose a rewrite next weekend.
> >
> >
> > That sounds a good move, Andrea. However, one question that needs asking
> is
> > why the AOO project (as opoosed to Apache in general) needs this page at
> > all. Now that LibreOffice uses the Mozilla license (which is not known
> for
> > compliance risks), which GPL-licensed suite is this page helping users
> > avoid?
> >
>
> There is no mention of LO on this page, nor any suggestion of it.
>

I did not say it did. I am a regular contributor to this project and my
comments are in that capacity, not as a representative of anyone else. My
question stands.

S.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message