Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C3A610EFF for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37776 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2014 08:33:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 37687 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2014 08:33:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 37672 invoked by uid 99); 26 Dec 2014 08:33:45 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:33:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [151.67.94.255]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 4F7441A025E; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <549C8C7C.8050800@apache.org> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:31:17 +0100 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with pootle References: <546A7CB3.1080903@apache.org> <546B5165.3020203@gmail.com> <546CD060.8040308@apache.org> <546DD82D.7030403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <546DD82D.7030403@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 20/11/2014 13:01, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 19/11/14 18:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> On 18/11/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> I simply forgot it and have this step not on my list. Maybe we can add >>> it on https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_for_developers to be >>> aware of this step in the future. >> >> This page (which I will call "A") has an "outdated" notice. It says that >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO (B) is the updated >> version, and this one in turn says that >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO/new_proposal (C) is >> better. >> >> Can we clarify this a bit? As things stand now (i.e., we use Pootle and >> don't have the genLang workflow enabled) which of A, B and C describes >> the current state of things and which one describes the latest ideas on >> genLang? > > I used mainly (A) and noticed the outdated as well :-( It's still on my > to-do list to update the page according my notes and how I do it > currently. This is of course independent of (C). I will also take a look > on (B), I remember that this is an old page and we started to document > our new collected knowledge on (A). Notices on pages A, B and C have been fixed accordingly. Still, it will be very good to have an update of A, especially the section about the SDF<->Pootle conversion. Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org