openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrea Pescetti <>
Subject Re: Problem with pootle
Date Fri, 26 Dec 2014 07:31:17 GMT
On 20/11/2014 13:01, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 19/11/14 18:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 18/11/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> I simply forgot it and have this step not on my list. Maybe we can add
>>> it on to be
>>> aware of this step in the future.
>> This page (which I will call "A") has an "outdated" notice. It says that
>> (B) is the updated
>> version, and this one in turn says that
>> (C) is
>> better.
>> Can we clarify this a bit? As things stand now (i.e., we use Pootle and
>> don't have the genLang workflow enabled) which of A, B and C describes
>> the current state of things and which one describes the latest ideas on
>> genLang?
> I used mainly (A) and noticed the outdated as well :-( It's still on my
> to-do list to update the page according my notes and how I do it
> currently. This is of course independent of (C). I will also take a look
> on (B), I remember that this is an old page  and we started to document
> our new collected knowledge on (A).

Notices on pages A, B and C have been fixed accordingly. Still, it will 
be very good to have an update of A, especially the section about the 
SDF<->Pootle conversion.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message