Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FD31176C2 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 06:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49350 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2014 06:56:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 49272 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2014 06:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 49259 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2014 06:56:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 06:56:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-wg0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 06:56:35 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z12so8364684wgg.25 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:56:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iQe7o7wGA04kKTtgPAqB4rI/dm7ITlsODwxDH0OSv60=; b=NeQU/nj7ZzP/AXwy34hgv5ibdusTIheo29iTj6OfnojVpE3NPcvH8pvpjGg3zDccXA upgl9KLIwyMwlkT7RKuvIULbKvyiVAiaXmykNhY8CV5U6ry9fsDJsMsMwUVVqYcvdqYT V9zHQRToenIedLnHRjjuR1izMgiBuOjUJpahI0rIU7pfeeOUXXgkzW1Cx3+fMS41JLMb Ay+d1HegdqVPOnQYsVSDK5Cv8neJrRqXUU04ZnPcv8QF4AtqJPEpU5KgbZbOqOQml5pF wzYfuyVravp2fvx/1FFugbd7I02LgJIcRPPPXt295bvXxb0RqOeTWO7HvkXVKj8GIR2V lYuw== X-Received: by 10.180.186.230 with SMTP id fn6mr3887407wic.44.1412664974074; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.43] (deibp9eh1--blueice3n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm19540647wja.25.2014.10.06.23.56.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54338E8B.8040503@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:56:11 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBTY2htaWR0?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: release manager for the next release References: <54331DAC.6090903@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <54331DAC.6090903@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 07/10/14 00:54, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 10/4/2014 1:57 AM, jan i wrote: >> Thanks jürgen for the work you have done. >> >> making a mac bot a priority seems to be easier said than done. We have had >> a ticket open with infra for more than 2 years, and despite many pokes from >> arist and myself, there are still no date when we can have one > An update on this. (drum roll please...) We have received the mac > buildbot! > There are various people to thank for finally getting this done, David > Nalley (vp infra) figured out how to move it forward. > At this point, I've had it for a week, but been OOTO due to some > conference. > I expect to have it build up and ready to go in short order. > sounds perfect, when you need help please let me know. Or when I can get access on the machine I can probably help with the setup as well. Juergen > A. >> >> We have the same problem with a number of our other platforms, and infra >> does not seems very busy with other issues than to care about our >> specialities. >> >> In other words, I strongly believe we have to depend on non-apache hardware >> to produce a major part of the binaries. A new release manager should >> provide or have access to several VMs in order to cut the release. It has >> always looked as if Jürgen had direct or indirect access to all the >> platforms needed. >> >> A release manager does not need to be PMC, but only the PMC have binding >> votes for a release......this can theoritically lead to a situation where >> the vote ends with only +1, but the release manager gives a non-binding -1. >> If nothing else that should lead to a funny board report. >> >> just my thoughts. >> rgds >> jan I >> >> Ps. it seems markmail does not support inline responses, or am I doing >> something wrong ? >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org