Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCF5C11034 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26031 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2014 18:58:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 25900 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2014 18:58:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 25625 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2014 18:58:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:58:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.113.200.129] (HELO homiemail-a80.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.129) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:58:24 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E8B37A06F; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (unknown [151.67.18.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andrea@pescetti.it) by homiemail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2A1F37A075; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <540F4DCC.4040608@apache.org> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 20:58:20 +0200 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Feature porting from LibreOffice References: <540EFC29.70600@wernig.net> <540F036C.1090902@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Guy Waterval wrote: > Not possible for a developer to use a double licence ? Sure it is possible. And it is also possible for the copyright holder to add the Apache 2 license to work previously released under other, usually more restrictive, licenses. > Or maybe the double licence is only possible with a couple of two copyleft > licences or not copyleft but not with a mix, as a couple with a copyleft > licence and another non copyleft ? This is totally wrong. I'm sure it's a honest question in your case, but a lot of people use this kind of "fake questions" to deliberately spread uncertainty about licenses. So, in short, these second group of questions is nonsense. > Other question : if an original work is produced under a double licence, > which is the licence of a derivate work : obligatory the initial double > licence of the original work or one or the other of the original work ? For the meaning we give to "double", this means "take this code under either license A or license B, whichever you prefer". If one of the option is the Apache License version 2, we can take the code and improve it under the Apache License version 2. Then other projects that chose more restrictive licensing terms can obviously use our improved code. There's no need that I always state that I'm not a lawyer and this is not legal advice, right? Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org