openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexandro Colorado <>
Subject Re: [WWW] I think we need a redo for /download/other.html
Date Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:41:57 GMT
On 7/23/14, Emanuele <> wrote:
> Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>> It would be better if you use the site to show it.
> I'm showing you the code, not the result, because the result is an
> almost exact copy of the table you already know (provided you have
> javascript enabled), only in "pure" HTML (no javascript required). The
> difference is that it is generated while building the site, and being
> the generation the point of my comment, I published only that part.
>> That said, the reason for the table is because we werent that open to
>> use Javascript. We would still argue that we have a <noscript> code.
>> Regardless if its XML, JSON or HTML or even a bash script to
>> autogenerate the HTML from a sqlite datasource.
> Not sure what you want to say here: is it fine with you to use js?
> Then it's fine with me as well. ;-)

Yes, sorry it didnt make sense, my point is how to allocate the
information of the download, I think embeded in the JS is not good,
and we could have a different feed (whenever XML, JSON or other).

The point is to make it easily maintainable.

> Emanuele
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9  5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message