Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 466FDF479 for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 10:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53278 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2014 10:57:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 53182 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2014 10:57:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 53174 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2014 10:57:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 May 2014 10:57:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mroellig.news@gmx.net designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.227.15.19] (HELO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.15.19) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 May 2014 10:57:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.66.100] ([86.56.80.235]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHXd2-1WsANa3xoS-003Pfg for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:07 +0200 Message-ID: <53831E02.5060009@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 12:57:06 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlhcyBSw7ZsbGln?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lazy Consensus] link to a german forum References: <1BB8BBCA5C3948F8B2262FE0221A0BAA@Esprimo7935> In-Reply-To: <1BB8BBCA5C3948F8B2262FE0221A0BAA@Esprimo7935> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:e74wQFlFxi7lTV2lBPrA5XHQF9sKsvKBY5AtvJFZrTyTbLrCfg+ SdwxpF0BeXCOxv4v8qN/BkeEzuSk6nSQItAb3jgJWKOxNO+sN/5vQ8UoftP30cu0sFGqOUF FsPX7h9BrdiWLeoJeXVs8NyAv/BR7krxGKIx+Cx7nFZcNiWmPru7L+62FX9lPX5Zmrak5Rc RyalOn9XkjeVdcyYlpKIQ== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello Jörg! Am 26.05.2014 11:29, schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > I suggest on the website https://forum.openoffice.org/ the following > text to add: > > "DE es gibt es bisher kein deutschsprachiges Unterforum, wir > empfehlen die Nutzung des externen deutschen Forums > http://de.openoffice.info" > > (translation: "DE there is so far no German speaking sub-forum, we > recommend the use of the external German Forum > http://de.openoffice.info") > > > *If there was no opposition in the next 3 days, I will carry out the > proposed changes.* It is bad that there is no DE subforum. But linking to http://de.openoffice.info is a bit problematic in my opinion. The reason is the combination of OOo and LO; it is not a main AOO forum. I'm not against to support AOO and LO in one place. But from the point of view of the project AOO there should be a stringent separation between this two apart drifting projects. The user must understand that LO<>AOO and the space between will get bigger. Each project have its own Bugzilla. And especially AOO Bugzilla doesn't need more bug reports and bug comments which LO belongs to. But this is only my opinion. Regards, Mathias --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org