Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE3EA1089D for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 20:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89623 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2014 20:40:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 89489 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2014 20:40:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 89479 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2014 20:40:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 20:40:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 84.46.103.117 as permitted sender) Received: from [84.46.103.117] (HELO mail-smtp-ng-out-1b.wtnet.de) (84.46.103.117) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 20:40:09 +0000 Received: from bc2-blade1.wtnet.de (mail-cust-ng-in-2.wtnet.de [84.46.103.102] (may be forged)) by bc1-blade6.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s27KdmHL019459 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 21:39:48 +0100 X-WT-Originating-IP: 46.59.228.19 X-WT-Authenticated-As: marcus.mail Received: from f9.linux (CM-POP8-19.catv.wtnet.de [46.59.228.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by bc2-blade1.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s27KdhuA018678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 21:39:48 +0100 Message-ID: <531A2E8F.3080507@wtnet.de> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:39:43 +0100 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [BUGZILLA] proposal for new entry in field Target Milestone References: <531728CB.6040601@googlemail.com> <53174F90.3010001@googlemail.com> <53179B2E.3030804@wtnet.de> <53182FD1.5080502@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <53182FD1.5080502@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 03/06/2014 09:20 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: > Hi, > > On 05.03.2014 22:46, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> Am 03/05/2014 05:23 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I >>>>> would >>>>> like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'. >>>>> Something >>>>> like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which won't >>>>> be part >>>>> of the AOO 4.1.0 release, but be part of the next following one. Once >>>>> we had >>>>> agreed on the version number for this release this new entry shall be >>>>> renamed accordingly. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Would it make sense to have two, like: >>>> >>>> AOO.next.micro >>>> AOO.next.minor >>>> >>>> That would map to things targeted for 4.1.1 (work done in the branch) >>>> versus 4.2.0 (work done in the trunk). >>>> >>> >>> It might make sense, but I think in this case we can name >>> 'AOO.next.micro' directly '4.1.1' (we also know, what the next micro >>> release will be) and it should be introduced right after our 4.1.0 >>> release, when a corresponding issue comes to life. >> >> +1 >> >> I also think that we can name the things directly. >> >> For issues that should be fixed/resolved in the mid-term future, we can >> use the already existing "AOO Later". >> > > strong -1 from my side for using 'AOO Later'. > my arguments are: > - There are already more than 1800 issue having this 'Target Milestone'. > - 'AOO Later' sounds like 'never' - just my experience from former days > when we had 'OOo Later' as 'Target Milestone'. ah, I remember. I'm rejecting my suggestion. ;-) Indeed better to start with a new name *and* nearly 0 issues. Sorry for the noise. Marcus >> And if there is no idea how and when to fix it, then simply don#t set >> any target version. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >>> BTW, is it possible to rename an existing entry of 'Target Milestone' as >>> I had propose above? >>> >>> Just my 2 cents. >>> >>> Best regards, Oliver. >>> >>>> -Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Any objections? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, Oliver. >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Ciao Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org