Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35F9E105DA for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16995 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2013 19:49:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 16900 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2013 19:49:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 16881 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2013 19:49:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:49:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 84.46.103.120 as permitted sender) Received: from [84.46.103.120] (HELO mail-smtp-ng-out-4b.wtnet.de) (84.46.103.120) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:49:44 +0000 Received: from bc2-blade1.wtnet.de (mail-cust-ng-in-2.wtnet.de [84.46.103.102] (may be forged)) by bc2-blade7.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAFJnMk7020142; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:49:22 +0100 X-WT-Originating-IP: 46.59.228.19 X-WT-Authenticated-As: marcus.mail Received: from f9.linux (pop8-19.catv.wtnet.de [46.59.228.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by bc2-blade1.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAFJnLk8026326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:49:22 +0100 Message-ID: <52867AC1.8080601@wtnet.de> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:49:21 +0100 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org CC: "marketing@openoffice.apache.org" Subject: Re: [Proposal] Update 'Get It Here' Banner References: <52867576.8000308@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <52867576.8000308@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 11/15/2013 08:26 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 15/11/2013 Samer Mansour wrote: >> Ok no one voted +1 nor -1 explicitly, but it sounds like people are happy >> with the new banner. ... http://dynomie.com/ext/getithere2.png FYI Only when we do an offical vote for something then +1 or -1 or 0 is important and counted - e.g., for a new AOO release. Otherwise it's just lazy consensus. Of course many of us write +1 to express that they like it. But this has no real meaning. It would also work without this as only the written text is taken into account. > Sure, it was lazy consensus on my side. Nice job! Me too. Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org