Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB14410BEB for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 06:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48266 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2013 06:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 48045 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2013 06:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 48037 invoked by uid 99); 9 Oct 2013 06:44:28 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 06:44:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO [9.155.131.113]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username hdu, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 06:44:28 +0000 Message-ID: <5254FB8D.1080301@apache.org> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 08:45:33 +0200 From: Herbert Duerr User-Agent: generic MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page References: <52546C37.6040808@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <52546C37.6040808@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08.10.2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > janI wrote: >> http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ ... >> So my first question is >> - what does a MAC page have to do here. MAC is a supported platform, not >> third party ? >> - why does the porting page not have a link to the mac page ? > > The Mac version used to be a port (you can still find outdated > information around, with the name "Aqua Port"), but it has been a fully > supported version since 3.0.0 or around. Yes, OOo 3.0 was our first version with Mac as fully supported platform. > So the porting page does not link to it since it's not a port. And the > URL is... well, historical, but I wouldn't oppose to move it outside > porting/ if we can setup redirects that won't break search engines. +1 for just redirecting to our download page. Herbert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org