Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A60A4102C1 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45528 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 08:17:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 45473 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 08:17:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 45458 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2013 08:17:37 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:17:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-lb0-f169.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username jani, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:17:37 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id z5so3861517lbh.14 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:17:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rqNL/D1TC1tyhbqzrRdRB0Ux8fDpTJ7j3jW0cQBmLJo=; b=f+1o0lQT7GSIhCZJwUkXHUUMBIEZQXM3K0stMb24Ahu0p/RcFQb+mSk8LNfn12TuaR ljd2l36BIDVLdatGVzQyxhnAfoKzEoAYBSKI2WZ48tCpvPMHMGRaNbd+UNSUFRFlWkKa TLVWdCId0rxYHNvx2FEm0L0851gNFd0ce/hT0V3ESvawjgfqZbf0UqvC0elQgyJ8tDti v3eFzRq4oGpuT1iZVXEkVconJb9xAqK74XcGDGRC5b9TFDxIkNwfeNcf/CbELTMuFw5Y QMDLxIdSzYI3OHq4xp6xx9zhayh8Tmh2MkNVzhtYTPr1K9zbo6C8F/CymFg1hC2nR8Ry zthA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.210.136 with SMTP id mu8mr5077205lbc.25.1379319454980; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.141.167 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:17:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <523638C0.2090907@apache.org> References: <5234B9B6.2060102@apache.org> <5234E4CB.7090501@apache.org> <523638C0.2090907@apache.org> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:17:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [announce] genLang extract is ready. From: janI To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3c70425605c04e67bd699 --001a11c3c70425605c04e67bd699 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 16 September 2013 00:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 15/09/2013 janI wrote: > > On 15 September 2013 00:49, janI wrote: >> >>> Please correct me, but fedora 19 is not part of our product release ? my >>> aim is to support what AOO supports. >>> >> > It is a standard Linux system, and OpenOffice should build and run on all > recent Linux systems. For sure it would be a bug (unrelated to this > discussion) if our official RPM packages did not run on it. > But I don't believe we have "supported" and "unsupported" Linux systems, as > in general any recent system with standard system tools will work. However, > I perfectly understand that you must start with something, and starting > with what the buildbots use is indeed the most reasonable choice. Then, if > adaptations are needed, we can find the patterns and apply them. > > OK, I simply dont have experience with fedora. I run with ubuntu 12.04, and the comilers etc. that come with that. I build trunk several times a week without problems, and of course also l10n40. But anyhow it must work on other platforms as well. > > my configure options are taken from our buildbot: >>> >> > It breaks the same way on my system. I explicitly tried with both > --with-stlport and --without-stlport since the default here depends on > whether you build on a 32 bit or 64 bit system. > > > I need to support vc 6.0 since our >>> buildbot uses that (even though its very outdated). Funny things here is >>> that VC 6.0 adn 2012 are imcompatible. >>> >> > This is something we can discuss. Supporting an obsolete compiler by being > incompatible with a newer one is understandable only if there are > advantages. I believe that other developers encountered this problem > already; they will be able to give better advice. The problem I had with VC6 was not access() as I thought, it was the std namespace and a couple of class constructs I use. It would be nice if we in general "upped" our compilers to the state of art. > > > function "access" is normally defined in sys/stat.h on linux. You need to >> see in which include file access is defined on your system, and either add >> an #ifdef for your system, or extend the include files. >> > > Thanks for investigating. As for the patch, I already included earlier in > this thread. > I have now added a #include , it seems ubuntu 12.04 includes that through another file. > > Then the build breaks in another file due to a conversion that my gcc does > not support/admit, but this should be quite unrelated... Now I have removed all warnings, so this is now one of the few modules without warnings (actually that would be a good task for a new developer). R1523556 compiles without warnings on ubuntu 12.04 and windows7 (VC2012). rgds jan I. @ariel wrote: You should try to avoid all that system calls, the URE libraries have a system abstraction layer to write portable code; vid. http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/cpp/ref/names/index.html This would not be a good idea, the tool is specifically written so it is indendent of all AOO libraries, thereby it can be placed anywhere in the build stream. Using the URE libraries will as far as I can see add quite a lot of dependencies. > > > Regards, > Andrea. > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org > > --001a11c3c70425605c04e67bd699--