openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kadal Amutham <vka...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection
Date Tue, 28 May 2013 02:10:23 GMT
Looks like we are retaining almost the current logo with some small changes

With Warm Regards

V.Kadal Amutham
919444360480
914422396480


On 28 May 2013 04:51, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:

>
> On May 27, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> > [This was cross-posted, so I'm not clear what list was intended.  Makes
> tracking the discussion difficult.]
> >
> > I'll bite:
> >
> > I prefer Chris's latest.  The weight of the lettering is more powerful.
> I think the "Apache" should not be so thin. The form used by Samer works
> better.  I also think down-scaling will work better in this case.
> >
> > As far as the orb goes, Chris's could be a tad larger, but not by much.
>  I prefer the orientation of the foreground bird to Kevin's, which has a
> more threatening feel in my subjective experience.
>
> These are good observations.
>
> I would like to see it with an "ffi" ligature.
>
> I think we should leave the 4 out. Others have mentioned that 4 is an
> unlucky number is some cultures. Perhaps we have compromise and have both
> versioned and un-versioned logo designs. If so then I think a treatment
> like "Version 4.0" in grey and blue might work.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
> >
> > - Dennis
> >
> > PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the current
> logo.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:22 PM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; marketing@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection
> >
> > What we've done so far:
> >
> > 1) Called for logo submissions from the community
> >
> > 2) Many designers responded and we received 40 submissions.  There was
> > a lot of "cross-fertilization" of ideas, as designers saw what others
> > had come up with, what worked, and borrowed ideas.
> >
> > 3) We did a survey of user responses to the 40 logo submissions.  Over
> > 5000 users offered their ratings and written comments.
> >
> > 4) Publish report and blog post on the results of the logo survey.
> >
> > 5) Invited the designers of the top-rated logos to read over the
> > survey comments and refine their designs and submit an updated
> > version.
> >
> > That's where we are now.  The updated logos (three of them) are on the
> wiki now:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Stage+2+Logo+Refinement
> >
> > As you can see there is quite a bit of convergence on a design occurring.
> >
> > So what next?
> >
> > I'd like to propose some next steps.
> >
> > A) Let's discuss the three designs on the mailing list for the next
> > week.   The discussion might lead to further refinement.
> >
> > B) If at the end of the week there is consensus on a single design
> > we'll go with that one.
> >
> > C) If at the end of the week there is not consensus on a single
> > design, and the discussion is not leading us closer toward consensus,
> > then we'll have a 72-hour vote of PMC members to pick the logo.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -Rob
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message