Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05A5CEFEC for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14524 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2013 15:52:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 14374 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2013 15:52:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 14335 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2013 15:52:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:52:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.69.77.164] (HELO mail.dasr.de) (217.69.77.164) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:52:05 +0000 Received: from p578b3c6a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.139.60.106] helo=[192.168.1.5]) by mail.dasr.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U3TlH-0006Kl-6N for dev@openoffice.apache.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:51:43 +0000 Message-ID: <5113CD84.1000304@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:51:32 +0100 From: RA Stehmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111120 Icedove/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache OpenOffice in Fedora 19? References: <5109384E.60606@apache.org> <51099A42.2050104@cfl.rr.com> <5109BCD6.3000705@apache.org> <5112B95E.3010406@apache.org> <5112C756.3020801@wtnet.de> <51135EED.1010908@apache.org> <51136247.80704@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBE7FCF96D074AF9BE2548000" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------enigBE7FCF96D074AF9BE2548000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 07.02.2013 13:26, schrieb janI: > If it is so classic, then for sure the ASF laywers could inform Fedora= > about the problem, and ask them to correct it, independently of whether= or > not AOO is distribtuted. I assume that since they are the distributors = they > need to make sure that their contributors uses valid trademarks. >=20 > This might be a problem on other distros as well. >=20 > Or is life not as simple as I think ? >=20 No, it isn't. It isn't really nice to sue another free software project. And using trademarks to break another free software projects will, seems no good idea nor a good public relation since Mozilla tried it. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation_software_rebranded_by_th= e_Debian_project Because of the licence it's quite easy to fork and rebrand AOO, so we've to be carefully to guard and promote our brand and save the respect of our project in the free software community. Regards Michael --------------enigBE7FCF96D074AF9BE2548000 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlETzYkACgkQB4PwVyFoz0cPYACfU8s9Pn0ppiX+/ZQ00XWYLOWa PNYAnAnbnF/birknUaoA5twTaqhWL8XN =yBHk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBE7FCF96D074AF9BE2548000--