Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C995DFCC for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2384 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2013 08:49:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 2309 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2013 08:49:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 2269 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2013 08:49:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:49:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gcaiod-ooo-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.3] (HELO plane.gmane.org) (80.91.229.3) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:49:35 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqK0t-0001gJ-2x for dev@openoffice.apache.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:49:27 +0100 Received: from e176037244.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.176.37.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:49:27 +0100 Received: from Joost.Andrae by e176037244.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:49:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@openoffice.apache.org From: Joost Andrae Subject: Re: What does "supported" mean for us? Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:49:04 +0100 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e176037244.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > So is Vista supported? It certainly isn't deprecated. But neither > is it getting the full QA treatment. Similar questions for Linux > releases. We don't test every release of every distro. We pick the > major ones, such as the Ubuntu LTS releases. > on Vista I would be surprised if AOO won't run on it. On Linux if AOO picks a defined version of a Linux distro as a 'supported' one then this would be the wrong decision. 'Supporting' has to be seen in a more technical manner not from the 'commercial support' POV. In the past OOo was built by using a build infrastructure that allowed OOo to run the binary on most of the Linux distributions. There were just a few distros that failed because they were incompatible to everything else. Platform compatibility depends on some prerequisites (just some examples): glibc versions supported system dependent system integration (eg. on KDE, Gnome, etc.) drag&drop support clipboard support sane support on that platform java dependencies on that platform (eg. Sun Java version, OpenSource derivates) The more important question is: Is AOO a LSB compatible application ? Kind regards, Joost