Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50F5ADF5.1010400@wtnet.de>
References: <50E870C3.8020704@apache.org>
	<50E880C3.1080303@apache.org>
	<50EB3201.90400@wtnet.de>
	<CAP-ksojPRHCHic7Rz+SimZ5RYxi6VC04SfDwM+0++fStvSzMWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<50EB4046.7090200@wtnet.de>
	<50EC82FD.3090105@apache.org>
	<50EF3473.9000108@wtnet.de>
	<CAP-ksohqqLkwBjKeVg-TpLFVFFLcGkdH8G5bfyi6KKVEX3=bgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50EF3E1E.9030702@wtnet.de>
	<CAP-ksohvJD=+fARtQRb25UL9hdCpnbvf4J4STVXxGRKrpdFxmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50F07601.8020205@wtnet.de>
	<CAP-ksojmMdK25g_mSBfTFc7+NaiwMESt0JPyp9cdkQNZ3PZ7Yg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50F30BCF.6050705@wtnet.de>
	<CAP-ksoj7E_007-nLr7+ezAtgA9wPTbJHQzcGBi2snPENmvUoNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50F3B14B.3070904@apache.org>
	<CAP-ksoiN=xAsq7k6-XCi3=tP_YRz5Q1-4TAR=gW_V9-i_ViyXg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50F5ADF5.1010400@wtnet.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:01:31 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAP-ksohDPpsgMbyX0pbovJwvE-5=-EyWkaDc8czuBGbOJt+fzg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [WEBSITE] broken link on mac porting page
From: Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org>
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.mail@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 01/14/2013 02:35 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Andrea Pescetti<pescetti@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I could see /platforms/mac if we imagine creating in the future
>>>> similar landing pages for Windows or Linux.
>>>> Note that today, a query of  "OpenOffice for Linux" has this ancient
>>>> page as a #1 hit:
>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/setup-linux.html
>>>> And the #1 hit for "OpenOffice for Windows" is not even at our
>>>> website.  It goes to CNet's download.com page.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Very interesting. Indeed this could also be the way to catch users who
>>> look
>>> for "OpenOffice Portable", for example, and should know that we do have=
 a
>>> (third-party, from winPenPack) version available; they are now offered =
an
>>> ancient version since OpenOffice Portable has not been updated yet. The
>>> updated version is not on the first page of search results.
>>>
>>
>> Exactly.
>>
>> In the last month we've seen the following related queries:
>>
>>          openoffice portable    2,500
>>         open office portable    1,000
>>         openoffice portable italiano    150
>>         apache openoffice portable      16
>>         portable        90
>>         openoffice portable download    16
>>         portable openoffice     12
>>         openofficeportable      <10
>>         office portable         <10
>>         openoffice portable=E6=97=A5=E6=9C=AC=E8=AA=9E=E7=89=88         =
<10
>>         openoffice portable 3.4         <10
>>         openoffice 3.4 portable         <10
>>         openoffice portable deutsch     <10
>>         openoffice.org portable =E6=97=A5=E6=9C=AC=E8=AA=9E=E7=89=88    =
<10
>>         portable open office    <10
>>         openoffice.org portable         <10
>>         openoffice portable =E6=97=A5=E6=9C=AC=E8=AA=9E         <10
>>
>> For many of these queries the #1 page is the German page:
>> http://www.openoffice.org/de/downloads/oooportable.html.  That is not
>> the optimal page for most of these queries.
>
>
> Maybe a good chance to add a "/products/portable" area like Rob suggestes=
 in
> a later mail and attempted already with "/products/windows".
>

We sort of have that indirectly since the /products pages would have a
leftnav link point to /porting  and /porting already links to the
winPenPack distribution.

I suppose it depends on whether we want to make a distinction between
the binaries that we sign and release, which we know comes from our
release source code, versus downstream versions which might vary.

-Rob

> Marcus
>