Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A187E941 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56203 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2013 18:12:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 56109 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2013 18:12:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 56101 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2013 18:12:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:12:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.173] (HELO mail-ie0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:12:24 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id e13so20103208iej.32 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:12:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kxPNfcHxNU17H0jW5F9OgUECk5iVw++EGPrmGWkJCmY=; b=Ux0N07RZsDzgPEssyTrOFWcu0pwZ+i9UT+7KzAcmB9vZtSrLrVVMr8+w3qqAf+NjQV ydy3PHhXITISeFGNU0jGR78QOibDUZ6Wmg1sf2z1OQ+RHMtc+9bLvFqkwFaSs6Guehh2 ghNwy5pgAkEL4w8OUfCwZWWkp4ZYeq4t+NTnNkmQpC+JQozhuWo5rt0COQbi7Z/MvGPF u0BMwL0e+1lyTa8EVPX0C4rUxX5DpI2bGIzGYhDdko5QD+E93n8K6ICqnFsBZJ1ySL7j mhBJlrGIaa4eD8zWOkfKJ8eKJRKvR9PE6MAD4gL+H8vdqN5o6G5Welp/VDsABEeWQ7cl fpug== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.152.132 with SMTP id uy4mr45330818igb.3.1357323123815; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:12:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.81.133 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:12:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50E61658.5080805@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:12:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] lazy consensus for new News scrolling From: Kay Schenk To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3b9eb1a3f45604d27a6ae7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f3b9eb1a3f45604d27a6ae7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > Here's is the latest/final draft for the proposed new user portal web > site > > home page incorporating News scrolling: > > > > http://www.openoffice.org/test/ > > > > I am invoking "lazy consensus" for this change. If I hear no complaints > by > > Sunday 1750 PDT, I will implement this change. > > > > I can see how this makes it easier to manage the news articles. > Previously we kept the most recent articles on index.html and > "rotated" the older ones off onto an archive page. This was a manual > process, an extra set of steps. With your new SSI mechanism we just > keep all of the news articles in a single SSI file, the are displayed > on the home page and the user can scroll through them. So from the > perspective of the author of the news stories this is a big > improvement. Thanks for looking into this! > > However, from the perspective of the page reader, this has two liabilities: > > 1) Aesthetically, from a design perspective this doesn't work well, > especially that scroll bar. IMHO, it does not look like a > professional page. > comments duly noted on the scroll bar...I could look for some better styling on this. > 2) Impact on page load time. As we add more stories to the SSI, > especially stories with images/photos (which I'd like to start doing) > the page size is going to increase. Eventually this becomes a problem > and we're back to manual rotation of the stories to an archive page. > This is certainly true. I was thinking we would eventually "cut off" older items from the bottom of the ssi file. Nothing to prevent any committer from doing this. > > Since this is the visitors first impression of the project, I wonder > if it is worth exploring further to see if there is a way to address > these issues? As I mentioned before, the ASF home page has a "latest > activity" panel that avoids both of these problems: > > http://www.apache.org/ > > Can we copy what they do? > ummm...not sure about this. We would need to do more thorough investigation here. Right now, I can not easily determine how this column is generated -- manually vs something else. In any case, removing the scrolling styling from the current ssi would certainly do away with the bars. If we wanted to keep all the news items in one file but only bring in like the last 10 or something, there MAY be a way to do that. You could certainly do it either with server side JS or a cgi. Anyway, I will hold up on this change for now I guess. I agree that the scroll "bars" don't look very professional. I may find some nicer looking scrolling mechanism... > -Rob > > > Thereafter all "news" items will not be added to the home page directly > or > > to /news/index.html, but to /news/newslist.ssi (this is a text file, not > > html), LIFO order, maintaining the styling you see for other items there. > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > MzK > > > > "No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted." > > -- Aesop > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted." -- Aesop --e89a8f3b9eb1a3f45604d27a6ae7--