Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58DBBED2C for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22954 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2013 19:29:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 22877 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2013 19:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 22868 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2013 19:29:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:29:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 84.46.103.119 as permitted sender) Received: from [84.46.103.119] (HELO mail-smtp-ng-out-3.wtnet.de) (84.46.103.119) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:29:19 +0000 Received: from bc1-blade2.wtnet.de ([84.46.103.103]) by bc1-blade7.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0FJSvrF029709 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:28:57 +0100 X-WT-Originating-IP: 84.46.110.107 X-WT-Authenticated-As: marcus.mail Received: from f9.linux (pop8-1636.catv.wtnet.de [84.46.110.107]) (authenticated bits=0) by bc1-blade2.wtnet.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0FJSrtM031724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:28:57 +0100 Message-ID: <50F5ADF5.1010400@wtnet.de> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:28:53 +0100 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [WEBSITE] broken link on mac porting page References: <50E870C3.8020704@apache.org> <50E880C3.1080303@apache.org> <50EB3201.90400@wtnet.de> <50EB4046.7090200@wtnet.de> <50EC82FD.3090105@apache.org> <50EF3473.9000108@wtnet.de> <50EF3E1E.9030702@wtnet.de> <50F07601.8020205@wtnet.de> <50F30BCF.6050705@wtnet.de> <50F3B14B.3070904@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Am 01/14/2013 02:35 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> I could see /platforms/mac if we imagine creating in the future >>> similar landing pages for Windows or Linux. >>> Note that today, a query of "OpenOffice for Linux" has this ancient >>> page as a #1 hit: >>> http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/setup-linux.html >>> And the #1 hit for "OpenOffice for Windows" is not even at our >>> website. It goes to CNet's download.com page. >> >> >> Very interesting. Indeed this could also be the way to catch users who look >> for "OpenOffice Portable", for example, and should know that we do have a >> (third-party, from winPenPack) version available; they are now offered an >> ancient version since OpenOffice Portable has not been updated yet. The >> updated version is not on the first page of search results. >> > > Exactly. > > In the last month we've seen the following related queries: > > openoffice portable 2,500 > open office portable 1,000 > openoffice portable italiano 150 > apache openoffice portable 16 > portable 90 > openoffice portable download 16 > portable openoffice 12 > openofficeportable <10 > office portable <10 > openoffice portable日本語版 <10 > openoffice portable 3.4 <10 > openoffice 3.4 portable <10 > openoffice portable deutsch <10 > openoffice.org portable 日本語版 <10 > portable open office <10 > openoffice.org portable <10 > openoffice portable 日本語 <10 > > For many of these queries the #1 page is the German page: > http://www.openoffice.org/de/downloads/oooportable.html. That is not > the optimal page for most of these queries. Maybe a good chance to add a "/products/portable" area like Rob suggestes in a later mail and attempted already with "/products/windows". Marcus