Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03A9AED04 for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 17:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78247 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2013 17:44:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 78072 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2013 17:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 78060 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2013 17:44:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:44:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.113.200.5] (HELO homiemail-a46.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:44:23 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCC53E405C; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 09:44:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [151.67.108.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andrea@pescetti.it) by homiemail-a46.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE9543E4055; Tue, 1 Jan 2013 09:44:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E3205F.8010209@apache.org> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:43:59 +0100 From: Andrea Pescetti Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org CC: Hamid Farroukh Subject: Re: [EXT] Dictionary extension for a Latin transcription of Persian References: <1356974226.38783.YahooMailNeo@web171603.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1356974226.38783.YahooMailNeo@web171603.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 31/12/2012 Hamid Farroukh wrote: > I have made a dictionray extension for the transcription of Persian > with Latin alphabet. That means, I have a way of writting Persian as > I would write English or German. This should help joung Persians > living in the US and Europe to learn Persian and write Persian texts. Hi, is this version of Persian something that you personally conceived or something more standardized, perhaps one of the Persian transliterations listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_language#Latin_alphabet ? If it has a name and it is a somewhat standard transliteration, we can definitely include it in OpenOffice 4, expected in April or around. > 1- Is it possible to use a custom dictionary for Persian as a > "western language"? Users should see an entry in the language > selection indicating Persian. Adding another language is feasible. We prefer to add languages that have an ISO code or some form of standardization. It wouldn't be called "Persian" to avoid name clash, but something like "Persian (Latin)" or "Persian (Fingilish)" (if that's the name) could be feasible. Note that here I'm just referring to add a language name, i.e., just one additional option in the list where you can select if your text is in English, or German, or French and so on. > 2- If not, may I publish it to the > extension page for others to use? Users should know that they can use > this dictionary, when they chhose Esperanto as language. Or would I > viloate some policies? We don't have a strict policy on this (I mean: we surely won't delete the extension from extensions.openoffice.org, even though we would require that the problem and the workaround are properly explained), but it would be much clearer to just add the language to OpenOffice, to avoid conflicts and misunderstandings. Just tell us more about this variant of Persian and we'll see how to handle that. Regards, Andrea.