openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From janI <j...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [discussion] Buildbot standard a.o or our own.
Date Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:25:50 GMT
Andrea:

thx for your observations.

With the very low activity we have on trunk, there might be no reason for
statistics.

I am simply just used to a more comfortable and flexible build system. If I
want to check my l10n changes on different platforms I have to (or so I
have been told) merge it to trunk and maybe be a pain for all others, an
alternative (which is seen in other build systems) is a possibility to
register a branch for a single night-compile.

but I will leave that theme to others.
Jan I.

On 1 January 2013 23:07, Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@apache.org> wrote:

> janI wrote:
>
>> I might be wrong but do we e.g.
>> - get automatic mail when a build fails ?
>> - have a statistic over our build through time ?
>>
>
> Notifications are sent to openoffice-commits, see for example
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/openoffice-**
> commits/201301.mbox/%**3C20130101075333.41945C00F8@**aegis.apache.org%3E<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-commits/201301.mbox/%3C20130101075333.41945C00F8@aegis.apache.org%3E>
>
> I don't know if we have a handy way to see the build history and not just
> the latest build status displayed at
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/>
>
>
>  I think the job being done today is great, and was in my own (obviously
>> not
>> too elegant) way just trying to see if we could improve.
>>
>
> I didn't see anything inappropriate in the requests and reactions about
> the buildbot so far... it's normal to ask, it's normal to expect easy
> fixes, and it's normal that more challenging changes are accepted or denied
> based on discussion with people who are doing that work.
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message