Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA005DFA8 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53250 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2012 14:22:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 53174 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2012 14:22:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 53153 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2012 14:22:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:22:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rgb.mldc@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:58 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hm11so9035385wib.2 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:21:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1eLht5FDb+R8WaUCecFC/StNT8nVTC8Zq27X3p2xnro=; b=vGSCTOxf8+alZ2ChGgmu2sZqeINrbV3doY4Spxg4NSoD4EjG2/xoWDkFihsrZN0/vR N8cvxGauf2KW74ZBqoo+pgeXMjYYHMUgvuP223IFztfmPMWBMpQcgPHj6DmQTSDMpv/S nT3z/vs8wxySCW9gkBzofs+qcZivtdDJ7OPZoMep8QpGjeRy/tbPDE4VkLKEO9Ji2w5f qk9JCDNW0VT415DTI/r2EgtjLdaOvPqvYQM+Hpl2Vi7tD59GL4xZndgMQ7GcRGNZYa+u vn//11RGpagvyvMJ+mvNmiZ3BqtZZHsUY0xEhO1GlAgvCaX8qb/pXlh4q1arhqPjJJlt /oZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.109.201 with SMTP id hu9mr9196539wib.32.1356877297008; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:21:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.167.9 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:21:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50E03AFE.7000500@cfl.rr.com> References: <20121230121122.f41c48d78094df59fc99bdbf@iol.ie> <50E03AFE.7000500@cfl.rr.com> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:21:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Endnote/Index in Writer From: RGB ES To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2356bd4abee104d2129db2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f2356bd4abee104d2129db2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2012/12/30 TJ Frazier > On 12/30/2012 07:11, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >> >> On the en-Forum it has just been pointed out to me that Endnotes place >> themselves at the End of a document; this prevents an alphabetical Index >> being placed there, which is the usual location for it. Perhaps this >> should be considered for alteration in a forthcoming revision of Writer. >> >> Hi, Rory, > > Would a "fake" master doc (only one sub-document) be a quick way around > this problem? I don't think so. The only way to move endnotes from the end of the document is to enclose the whole document/chapter on a section configured to send the endnotes at the end of the section itself instead of the end of the document. While this workaround covers most user cases, there could be corner situations (a document already using lots of sections, for example to get variable number of columns) where this will not work as intended. Regards Ricardo > The endnotes should stay with the chapter, and the index, specified in the > master, should come last. (I don't use these features, so I can't say for > sure.) > > HTH, > /tj/ > > > --e89a8f2356bd4abee104d2129db2--