Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1991CD090 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23540 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 14:18:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23469 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2012 14:18:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23449 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2012 14:18:38 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:18:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:18:37 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ez10so2716423vbb.6 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:18:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.187.234 with SMTP id fv10mr67055297vec.8.1351779516430; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.157.77 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:18:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Have you been contacted via private email and discouraged from participating on the OpenOffice project? From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: ooo-marketing@incubator.apache.org, ooo-l10n@incubator.apache.org, ooo-qa@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm hearing that some project volunteers, especially new ones, are being contacted by certain external parties, who then try to discourage them from contributing to the Apache OpenOffice project. I'm hearing that similar notes have been sent out to those who submitted listings to our new Consultants Directory, also discouraging them from involvement in the project. This is my personal view on this matter, for what it is worth. I think we all would agree that such techniques are deplorable and bring disrepute to the individuals involved, and to the project that sanctions such techniques. If you recall we had a similar wave of such unprofessional behavior a few months ago, when certain external parties were contacting journalists who mentioned OpenOffice and telling them that it was no longer being developed and to link to a different product instead. I any case, if you are receiving such FUD yourself, I'd encourage you to simply post it to this mailing list, or to your blog, or some other public website. "Daylight is the best antiseptic" as they say. I am not a medical doctor, but I do believe that FUD exposed to public scrutiny loses its potency. But FUD ignored is FUD that spreads. Regards, -Rob