Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38A69D7D1 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6432 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2012 01:22:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-openoffice-dev-archive@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 6348 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2012 01:22:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@openoffice.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@openoffice.apache.org Received: (qmail 6336 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2012 01:22:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:22:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peter.junge@gmx.org designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.165.64.22] (HELO mailout-de.gmx.net) (213.165.64.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:21:57 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2012 01:21:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [65.19.142.253]) [65.19.142.253] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 30 Nov 2012 02:21:36 +0100 X-Authenticated: #32612247 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18yviZjf9Ay0oEUPHYj/PDMfXpnv/gDb9ieFsOZtl Hjl5voo7u6tDCO Message-ID: <50B80A19.3080005@gmx.org> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:21:29 +0800 From: Peter Junge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: How do they do that? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/30/2012 5:10 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > See the fundraising appeal on Wikipedia? > > E.g.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strait_of_Magellan > > At the top, bold colors, really gets your attention, but it can be > dismissed by the user. > > Would something like this (maybe with less bold color) work better for us? The problem with doing something similar for AOO might be that the people who are donating may expect that they are giving money exclusively for AOO while the policy says that the money has to go to the ASF without any preferred purpose. Peter