Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E7FFDB0D for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 15:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92784 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2012 15:26:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92704 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2012 15:26:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92695 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2012 15:26:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:26:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [75.180.132.120] (HELO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com) (75.180.132.120) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:26:04 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Q6tQEvKa c=1 sm=0 a=4Jz+jJ0YjisZbq4FujTDrw==:17 a=RsiRbAn6vsoA:10 a=IcO7X2CKU14A:10 a=fsCq48hB72oA:10 a=7qsJXG2k14gA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=KCgTEIyrO_AA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=I49DVG9GSamnvr0XIHsA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=4Jz+jJ0YjisZbq4FujTDrw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 68.205.107.180 Received: from [68.205.107.180] ([68.205.107.180:50563] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by cdptpa-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 4C/70-18765-7F5E3905; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:25:43 +0000 Message-ID: <5093E5F3.7050100@apache.org> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:25:39 -0400 From: tj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [mwiki]SyntaxHighlight extension use wrong colours References: <50937E3D.5010603@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/2/2012 06:15, RGB ES wrote: > 2012/11/2 J�rgen Schmidt > >> On 11/1/12 9:24 PM, RGB ES wrote: >>> A volunteer on the ES wiki that is working on an introduction to macro >>> programming, informed that the SyntaxHighlight extension is using the >> wrong >>> colours for StarBasic, Python and JavaScript. >>> >>> Is this something that needs to be informed directly to mediawiki or the >>> colours used by the extension are a configuration option set on our side? >>> >> >> I don't know which extension we use but I assume it can be configured. >> Somebody with karma has to check the extension on our wiki. >> >> Maybe a little bit more info which colors are wrong, or an example. But >> what means wrong here, colors are always a matter of taste ;-) >> >> Juergen >> > > I think (I'm just reporting the problem ;) ) that in this case wrong means > "different from the colours used by the AOO IDE". I'll ask more info to the > original reporter. > > Regards > Ricardo > Information about the syntax-highlighting extension can be found on the "Version" special page. A quick look at the links tells me we are quite far behind in versions (but we are also running old MW software), so complaints about problems with an old version are probably useless. I fear that it will take a PHP programmer to make any local changes, but I could be wrong. Please note that the AOO IDE colors are entirely customizable through Tools > Options > Appearance. /tj/