openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shenfeng Liu <>
Subject Re: Fidelity Improvement sample wiki
Date Fri, 23 Nov 2012 06:32:37 GMT
  Thanks for your comments!
  Please see my comments below.

- Shenfeng (Simon)

2012/11/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <>

> Hi,
> On 21.11.2012 15:25, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
>> Hi, all,
>>    I created a wiki to show some fidelity improvement samples since AOO
>> 3.4.1 in our current build:
>> Improvement_Since_AOO341#**OOXML_Support<>
>>    The purpose of this wiki is to promote our significant fidelity
>> enhancements with shining samples. Of course not all the
>> enhancements/defect fixes can be included in this wiki.
>>    Thanks to Jian Yuan Li, Lei Wang, Jian Hong, Zhe Wang and Ying Zhang
>> and
>> other people who send me a lot of good samples. I didn't finish the wiki
>> yet. While any comments are welcome.
> Cool stuff - Thanks for the effort so far.
> I am looking forward to see all these kind of improvements presented like
> this.
>     For now I have 2 questions:
>> 1. I think the contents in this wiki should be in the release notes of our
>> coming 4.0. Maybe a link to this wiki page from release notes? Any
>> suggestion?
> Yes, such things should go into our Release Notes.
> From my point of view these improvements should be directly in the Release
> Notes - they should be made very visible to the users who will checkout
> what is in the next release. The compare of screenshots is an easy way for
> our users to get an idea of the improvements.
> Thus, we can use this wiki as one of the input sources for our Release
> Notes.

While I saw the discussion on 3.5 vs 4.0 and cwiki vs mwiki is still on
going. And later we may need to figure out a new release notes template for
the rich contents. So for now I will continue to work on the current wiki
page, and move to new place later when we agree on the way.

>  2. Currently I can not upload the file of docx, pptx or xlsx. I wonder if
>> any one can help to add them to the permission list?
> As far as I can see for all improvements we have an Bugzilla issue.
> Thus, I think it is enough to have the sample files attached to the
> Bugzilla issues - no need for duplicates. If the samples are attached to
> the Bugzilla issue you can provide a direct link to it - e.g. link to
> sample file of issue 119963 -
Good suggestion! Only problem is that in some defects the original
attachment is complex, and developers made simple samples for me. But I can
try this way. And attach the simple samples back to the defects.

> Best regards, Oliver.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message