Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BCF8D2A3 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97161 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2012 12:43:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96900 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2012 12:43:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96873 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2012 12:43:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:43:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:43:13 +0000 Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5so263872bkc.6 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 05:42:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ONtUm7QG+DqP62fbvxcjEZdebl2IYQiJALCsfMd8Pyo=; b=N5cZh9RFfyCnOy4Fz2sSAFRLL5I868oEHDPMvqB2yYvQ+7PnPDnktCkUwN8iYg+S87 Po3dfUuVOf7/IIVzvaBksxV8l1+laNU20hhJPXZkzVcM6iUNRhpylLd7KGZKnHW9CUVL c+qiCGpQC9w4sxfYrjuRNEle+Aj9wIVgfJ3qQD/x2Ut7I648h+az1CDQH/Qy/M2+pBVi 5pYYX7WNv0X1QH/Gei/9DSOuhZXQ3lJWgPrv48ESvrIGNedJm1OK87F+0dmtXZYEuZc1 DNP00947Ee1It159XCvOqElg3+ZNvb1JpGGFx8h5eJIV9Fqt1DWqW7oTH3geeZmuLZ/Z cmMg== Received: by 10.204.157.156 with SMTP id b28mr9507726bkx.27.1346848973443; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 05:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.86] (deibp9eh1--blueice2n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m9sm1028875bkm.10.2012.09.05.05.42.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 05:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <504748CA.3050401@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:42:50 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Does anyone know the status of OO performance item? References: <504478C4.9050005@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <504478C4.9050005@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 9/3/12 11:30 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Him > > On 31.08.2012 10:18, shzh zhao wrote: >> hi, >> >> I found there is an item to improve the OO performance. >> >> http://www.openoffice.org/tools/performance/ >> >> Investigate reducing the save and load time of OpenOffice.org 6.0 files >> (XML): >> >> - >> >> Find where it needs how much time. >> - >> >> Think about where and what to optimize. >> - >> >> Test the above to see how much reduction in save and load time can be >> achieved, if any. >> >> In Progress >> >> Sascha Ballach (Spreadsheet) >> Daniel Vogelheim (Text) >> Bj�rn Milcke (Chart) >> Christian Lippka >> >> Does anyone know the status of this item? >> > > This one seems to be very very outdated as OpenOffice.org has introduced > ODF as its native format for OOo 2.0 (released 10/2005, if I remember it > correct). > I would say that we delete this page to avoid further confusion. When we focus on performance and take specific actions and when we want to document it I suggest to create a wiki page if not already one exists. Juergen