Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
References: <505A1DC4.5030600@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <1348084712.89617.YahooMailNeo@web113512.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
Reply-To: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
Subject: Re: [CODE] gmake and AOO build system
To: "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <505A1DC4.5030600@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Andrew;=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A...=0A> =0A> I have been =
provided patches necessary to apply the following CWSes to AOO =0A> trunk:=
=0A> =0A> =A0  ause131=0A> =A0  ause130=0A> =A0  writerfilter10=0A> =A0  gn=
umake4=0A> =A0  sd2gbuild=0A> =0A> As I understand it this is mostly gbuild=
 stuff that we did not want to apply to =0A> 3.4.x as it might destabilize =
the build.=0A> This was provided to me by Michael Stahl, and represents wor=
k done by Oracle =0A> emps when OOo was still at Oracle.=0A> =0A> Is there =
any resistance from checking in these patches?=A0 If I don't hear any =0A> =
opposition in 72 hours and the patches cleanly apply on my dev area, I will=
 =0A> check in these changes.=0A>=A0=0A=0ANot an objection at this point bu=
t this is likely to break transitorily=0Athe FreeBSD port.=0A=0AIt would be=
 helpful to see the patches before they are applied.=0A=0APedro.