Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69565DE22 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89253 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2012 06:53:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88911 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2012 06:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88868 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2012 06:53:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:53:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of clarence.guo.bj@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:53:15 +0000 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so297126pbb.6 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=U4G6QrFnXgWrz2dz3TjFA0a8lwLdrJBYdPbVBoTYL20=; b=xbsMORDTquVPHziwtkbboN+IWKE74+vbUQQRVxnObMoXY7YG/lKrWGXdY7YYpTsK5t j81fA5LMqImibzjrwlzoHmkQ25HPoVmcdDjeTKmYbDxTggQZ0htfMEESJg6LlopQUKAZ Gy0UiuK0Ki9QEv/JTV+2HhqX58IJtf0UO6wuE3HWTdPK78NIkHuAYALw09hp8hR+YOfa AJti7dZOjt41bqrKoQ/emrcIEDDj2BKdrD4Znm5KE6uJGVV1+neCEzXzoRjctgOOtXlz RZnu0/ErTr7w3sft72Fc/UDoAcblAlqOOrViHcYqGdfApa/GGvVg/yTwqGsBx4lABn04 KDGA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.221.72 with SMTP id qc8mr3840589pbc.63.1342507974674; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.14.36 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 23:52:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000301cd630c$73ea1350$5bbe39f0$@net> References: <000301cd630c$73ea1350$5bbe39f0$@net> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:52:54 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: development question of future feature From: Clarence GUO To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff2567cf047b004c500fec2 --e89a8ff2567cf047b004c500fec2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think new UI means three aspects. One is about usability which make UI easier to use. Sidebar of Symphony is a good illustration. Symphony has another good improvement which drew less attentions, that is it reorganised the menus and toolbars(only on Java build version). The layout of menus and toolbars in Symphony is more reasonable I think. For example, the entry of define range name is from "Create" main menu in Symphony, but that of AOO locates in "Data" main menu. Symhony is better, because define range name will create a new name but actions under "Data" main menu are all related to concrete data operations. Here I want to discuss the other two aspects(visual design and resources). Maybe I missed some discussions, but I saw many discussions only focus on the first aspect. We also need a new visual design. Nowadays the the popular UI style is transparent + gradient effect, large and simplified icons, light colors, some animation effects, and so on. Our UI style is quite old. The visual design will give users the first feeling. So it is as important as the first aspect. And our resources are quite old too. Here the resources I mean gallery, templates of Presentaion master pages and so on. We really need to update them. I really hope new AOO3.5 or 4.0 can attract my eyes when I first see it. 2012/7/16 Christopher Jackson > I am writing to ask you if there is any desire among you and the developers > of OpenOffice to update the user interface for the suite? > > > > your competitor, microsoft of course has updated their user interface. as a > simple user, I think updating the user interface would greatly improve the > product. we can't always sit in one spot and never change. > > > > thanks for you time. > > > > Chris Jackson > > Maryland USA > > --e89a8ff2567cf047b004c500fec2--