Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 113BB9888 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50366 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 07:35:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50121 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2012 07:35:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50100 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2012 07:35:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:35:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:35:51 +0000 Received: by bkcjm2 with SMTP id jm2so5468684bkc.6 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:35:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o26aJmHQLHwGUyNQjcHcSPPdpXtHphwF7GfTQYwmcPE=; b=zAj17BQc58/UaWSgyezL4DtLHaVjcVvuK1WEBzDratZF2H+KohdfxkAwLDI9fYOLRx PAkEa9RA3q7CnRIUu9WByHUxFOjed5f2DJuD3ehJWXY+PTTnIM81VwQ9mkG3pZLy6aKx nZ2KTke4m5PCt5znnkFvfQaqvjc4HuTu7KsdnPOBcdHJy+H0juoKF32JqRwAjmnnvBZE HgXToNOJZyB78wgbuWtj0Vu7GTJct1hIknvJ1h1TW+bFHS+RK71cEc1mqiU5UcAuvM1H FfmN23z7StGGX4Sfvicw5t1YGFd5BTs/MD7Echjoe0CHBS80ekzrsfG1mszWwO6mbGNI TDMg== Received: by 10.204.148.82 with SMTP id o18mr11150440bkv.85.1338968130714; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.155.131.47] (deibp9eh1--blueice2n2.emea.ibm.com. [195.212.29.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u8sm820630bks.0.2012.06.06.00.35.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FCF0840.1010105@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:35:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: The reason I removed the program called Open Office 3.4 References: <1338601701.13767.YahooMailRC@web184511.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <008301cd4088$f7fdfcc0$e7f9f640$@16degrees.com.au> <4FCA1CC7.5070305@apache.org> <4FCD90F9.8060608@pitonyak.org> <00f801cd434d$9a2e22b0$ce8a6810$@acm.org> <4FCEAA88.4090507@pitonyak.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/6/12 4:17 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote: > As I remember, it is the 2nd customer complaint we got on this issue. And > some of us (e.g. Jihui) has confirmed it. If that's the case, my question > is do we have a defect id to trace it? If no, let's create one. And I will > suggest it as 3.4.1 must fix. > an issue is good but we should be careful and should define a potential new default in detail. How exactly we want define the new default, having 2 complaints is not much compared to thousand of Windows users. I don't say that we shouldn't change it but we should be clear of what we are doing. We can't change things every time when 1 single person don't like the default. Juergen > > 2012/6/6 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak > >> Now that would be hilarious if that were the problem. Well, I am not >> calling him back to ask him what file extension, I spent about an hour >> chatting with him. I do not have time for a repeat. >> >> >> On 06/05/2012 03:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> >>> It seems that Windows 7 Wordpad will also open for an ODT file if no >>> Microsoft Office or *Office[.org] application has claimed the default. >>> >>> - Dennis >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mckenna@comcast.**net >>> ] >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 05:34 >>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: The reason I removed the program called Open Office 3.4 >>> >>> Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 06/04/2012 11:07 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Kay Schenk >>>>> wrote: >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>>> In no circumstance should AOO establish itself as a default for any >>>>>> file >>>>>> type. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd say "In no circumstance should AOO establish itself as a default >>>>> for any file type which is already associated with another program." >>>>> That is, we shouldn't "steal" file associations. If, OTOH, someone is >>>>> installing AOO on a box without MS Office, then it makes perfect sense >>>>> to make AOO the default program for .doc, .ppt, etc. >>>>> >>>>> Likewise, most people probably don't have a "native" ODF program on >>>>> their systems, and installing AOO as the default for ODF would >>>>> probably make sense in most cases. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Phil >>>>> >>>>> Claim is that it hijacked files from word pad. No idea what that >>>> extension might be, i did not ask him. >>>> >>>> the default extension for wordpad is rtf and AOO does appear to define >>> itself as the default for that extension. >>> >>> regards >>> Keith >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Andrew Pitonyak >> My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/**AndrewMacro.odt >> Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php >> >> >