openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From drew jensen <drewjensen.in...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Must use the incubating qualifier
Date Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:53:28 GMT
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 09:51 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:48 AM, drew <drew@baseanswers.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 08:52 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Ross Gardler
> >> > <rgardler@opendirective.com> wrote:
> >> >> It has been pointed out on the general list that AOO is not always
using
> >> >> the incubating qualifier. For example recent blog posts don't include
it.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > It is right there, first thing on the page, in a very large font, for
> >> > every blog post:  "Apache OpenOffice (incubating)"
> >> >
> >>
> >> E.g, :  https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/5_million_downloads_of_apache
> >>
> >> Note the <title> of the page says "Apache OpenOffice (incubating)".
> >> Ditto for the largest (and first) header on the page.
> >>
> >> Looking at the general list, it sounds like NIck's issue was that blog
> >> aggregators, such as used by Apache for generating content on the home
> >> page are not picking up on this.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Maybe, I just read the incubator list also I think Nick is saying that
> > _any_ time the phrase Apache OpenOffice is used it must have the word
> > incubating included, not just in the title.
> >
> 
> But that's not the policy.  The policy is that it must be called out
> as incubating at first mention in the document.

That's what I thought also - I'm saying how it reads to me, that's all.

> 
> -Rob
> 
> >
> > //drew
> >
> > <snip>
> >



Mime
View raw message