openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <>
Subject Re: [RELEASE] new DL test...needs review and comments, and probably correction
Date Sun, 06 May 2012 17:08:46 GMT
Am 05/06/2012 06:32 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>>> Yes, this is known as I wrote already that there are no localized
>>>> Windows builds at all and no Linux x86-64 full install builds
>> @Andrea:
>> You have checked the links on the checksums webpage. Can you confirm
>> that the hash file for these files only are missing? Or have you seen
>> other files?
> I noticed the same pattern as you, i.e., Windows and Linux x86-64
> missing, but there are minor deviations. If this can help, the list of
> broken links to sha512 hashes follows (and, as far as I've seen, it
> seems to match the list of missing files):

Thanks a lot for the list. :-)

I can see that for localized builds the files are missing consistently 
(the already stated Windows full install and Linux x86-64 full install 
combination), except for en-GB, here all Linux and Linux x86-64 builds 
are missing.

Furthermore, all SDK builds are named wrong. They have "3.4" as version 
string. But it has to  be "3.4.0".

The links for following links are working nevertheless from your list 
and from the checksums webpage:


View raw message