Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B7FF91B5 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77131 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2012 21:45:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76611 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2012 21:45:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76457 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2012 21:45:37 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:45:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lp-shahaf.local) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username danielsh, mechanism login) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:45:36 +0000 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 00:45:25 +0300 From: Daniel Shahaf To: "KS@apache.org" Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, infrastructure@apache.org Subject: Re: Mirroring both OOo and AOOo Fwd: [Daniel Shahaf: Opt-out from mirroring resource-intensive projects] Message-ID: <20120420214525.GB3829@lp-shahaf.local> References: <1334946353.82402.YahooMailClassic@web113514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <2CC4332C-A58D-471A-A6A1-EC42C83A5CE4@comcast.net> <4F91D75A.5060502@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F91D75A.5060502@apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) KS@apache.org wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 14:38:34 -0700: > I'm assuming by Pedro's remark that if 3.3.0 is ported to Apache > archives, security patches will have been applied -- i.e. THAT version > rebuilt with security, right? "Rebuilt" kind of defeats the purpose of archives.. (the same version number shouldn't correspond to more than one set of source code)