Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83B559B25 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 23:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57404 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 23:06:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57338 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2012 23:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57330 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2012 23:06:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:06:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dwhytock@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:06:06 +0000 Received: by qcso7 with SMTP id o7so3215906qcs.6 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:05:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JlfOxOy0d0yno71FhVJRKZgw/lw1eBeEiEunEZIE/0c=; b=hBOvJ/t0557SLweTtYH6UeS17F9vZMT0uhE3Zwxo8woiqq6Ec4DLC9jdhrXTu4vXaA b6QVW4cNj80xPwQOoZQ3A6kLTztvdCbrsSwUdcsJ/ofxJDNbAKEskJGK6n5r7zGpFZnb qi+VYFdpylAwlioXU1amyLH6eMS9sVOTq9stPV+AWOUV5E8zivXyAkaYPIdd5/CCmzml 5kk1c3kcEmlhyH4d9//3Uo4mbworruSKIxkMeGANYa2xaZ1xW6ZLRMN27kk9wX9Ux3L/ UFvijfmqfQ3+5sLEBp1xjVjoUywe5CvroWFCYSMIKLsffRGqzEI4YUfkje7N4uyh2g0I uKtw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.116.6 with SMTP id k6mr129794qaq.91.1331075145994; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.113.15 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:05:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <000901ccfbe3$855eeb00$901cc100$@zybura.com> References: <4F564244.4060009@googlemail.com> <000901ccfbe3$855eeb00$901cc100$@zybura.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:05:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DRAFT]: Request for an early review of an potential Apache OpenOffice release From: Donald Whytock To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, hzybura@zybura.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Grammar-weenie-ing: "We did a lot of IP clearance work to become Apache conform" That sentence structure suggests "compliant" instead of "conform", as in "to become Apache-compliant". Alternately, you can say "IP clearance work to conform to Apache standards" or "to conform to the Apache Way". --- "We are preparing developer snapshots since several weeks" I'd suggest "We have prepared developer snapshots over the past several wee= ks". --- "because of the complexity of the project we would be very much appreciate" Remove "be". --- "We know that we have no RC candidate right now" RC =3D release candidate? If so, replace "RC" with "release" here. The second "RC" is probably okay. Otherwise, good content and tone. Don On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Hans Zybura wrote: > I don't know much about the incubator folks and the whole process. So I > can't really judge the timing of this. But I for my part wouldn't want to= be > left without dictionaries, but with a spellchecker gone wild instead, jus= t > because I did not really understand what the note of warning meant in pla= in > English. The amount of work already done will be more impressive, if the > known issues are better explained, especially the most obvious ones. > > Alternative wording suggestion: > > NOTE: Be careful with the binary packages and save your office user > profiles before testing. Existing OOo 3.x installations will be overwritt= en. > We provide full install sets to test system integration and upgrades. > Known issues: Currently we are not able to migrate installed > extensions. There will be no dictionaries, therefore the spellchecker wil= l > go wild. (We are > working on this, of course.) Please rename your user profile before testi= ng > our > snapshot build, and re-rename your user profile after reinstalling a stab= le > OOo version. > We recommend using a virtual machine for testing, not your production > environment. > > BTW: This would be a better wording for the note of warning on the downlo= ad > site for dev snapshots as well, I think. > > Hans > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.schenk@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 6:13 PM >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DRAFT]: Request for an early review of an potential Apache >> OpenOffice release >> >> J=FCrgen -- >> >> I don't know what the requirements are or will be, but I think this is a > good >> invitation to the "incubator" folks. Nice! >> >> >> 2012/3/6 J=FCrgen Schmidt >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would like to send =A0out the following email to the general incubat= or >> > mailing list to ask for early feedback related the general Apache >> > requirements. The main intention is to address potential issues asap >> > and to save time later on. >> > >> > Any opinions or improvements? >> > >> > Juergen >> > >> > >> > ### >> > Hi, >> > >> > the Apache OpenOffice podling project is moving forward to a first >> > release that is long expected by the OpenOffice.org community and user= s. >> > >> > You know that Apache OpenOffice is the continuation of OpenOffice.org >> > and that the project is very huge, has a very long history and a very >> > huge user base all over the world. >> > >> > We did a lot of IP clearance work to become Apache conform and we >> > would like to get some early feedback if we are in shape with the >> > Apache guidelines for a potential release. >> > >> > We are preparing developer snapshots since several weeks for our >> > project members to test and review. This developer snapshots can be >> > found under >> > >> > Source package >> > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/**developer-snapshots/src_** >> > releases/srcrelease.html> > pshots/src_releases/srcrelease.html> >> > >> > Binary package >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** >> > >> AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+**Snapshots> f >> > >> AOO+luence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshot >> s> >> > >> > The mac version is also signed and the check files can be found in the >> > download directory directly http://people.apache.org/~jsc/** >> > developer- >> snapshots/macos/**r1296433/> > developer-snapshots/macos/r1296433/> >> > >> > NOTE: be careful with the binary packages and save your office user >> > profiles. We provide full install sets to test system integration and >> > upgrades. And we are currently not able to migrate installed >> > extensions because of the removal of the Berkeley DB. But we are >> > working on this. You can easy rename your user profile can test our >> > snapshot build and can rename your user directory afterwards. >> > >> > Right now we are focusing on show stopper issues but nevertheless we >> > would like to invite you to review the source packages and also the >> > binary packages if they fulfill the Apache requirements (e.g license, >> > NOTICE, ...) >> > >> > We know that we have no RC candidate right now and that it would >> > require some work by you. But because of the complexity of the project >> > we would be very much appreciate any kind of early feedback at this >> > time. And the main goal is to fix potential issues early and to save >> > time later on when we have a first RC in place. >> > >> > On behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PPMC >> > >> > Juergen >> > ### >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > ------------ >> MzK >> >> "Follow your bliss." >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0-- attributed to Joseph Campbell >