openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maho NAKATA <cha...@mac.com>
Subject Re: time to create ooo-qa mailing list? Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)
Date Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:42:51 GMT
Hi Lily,
ok I sent a proposal to ooo-dev.
Please wait for 2 weeks to 3 weeks. 
Please send an e-mail as a reply to my proposal with reasons why you think you need ooo-qa
list.
Thanks
 Nakata Maho

From: xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: time to create ooo-qa mailing list? Re: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of
2012.03.19(2012.03.13 - 2012.03.19)
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:05:00 +0800

> Nakata,
> 
> Yes, I totally agree it's time to create QA mail list, who can help on it?
> It seems I haven't authority to create it. Do you can create? Or Rober, can
> you help?
> 
> Lily
> 
> 2012/3/21 Maho NAKATA <maho@apache.org>
> 
>> Hi Lily and all
>>
>> Now time to create a new ML, ooo-qa?
>> It's very hard to track such info, as you see, traffic of this mailing list
>> is very large amount.
>>
>> Thanks
>>  Nakata Maho
>>
>> From: xia zhao <lilyzhao8@gmail.com>
>> Subject: AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report As of 2012.03.19(2012.03.13 -
>> 2012.03.19)
>> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:38:53 +0800
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status:
>> > *Based on the test plan:
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan, I
>> can
>> > say that the planned work are 100% done.
>> > 100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the tests of areas
>> most
>> > impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance.
>> > 100% general testing have been done. These are general functional tests.
>> >
>> > *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/3/1 - 2012/3/12):
>> > *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev.
>> > r1299571<
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eorw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe
>> >
>> > Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac Lionn, Ubuntu 10.04, Redhat 6.1,
>> > Windows 7 SP1
>> > Test Cases Executed:
>> > IP Clearance: libneon replacement issue tracking
>> > General testing:
>> > Math formula
>> > Some Base functions
>> > *Interoperability automaiton testing:*
>> > Tested total 1188 files with following file types:
>> >
>> (odt)|(ott)|(sxw)|(stw)|(doc)|(dot)|(ods)|(ots)|(sxc)|(stc)|(xls)|(xlt)|(odp)|(otp)|(sxi)|(sti)|(ppt)|(pot)
>> >
>> > The test scenarios cover:
>> >
>> >    - Load
>> >    - Save
>> >    - Reopen
>> >
>> > Only one issue was found, it takes too long time (at least 4 minutes) to
>> > open one sample excel file and UI is blocked when loading. OpenOffice.org
>> > 3.3 has the same problem.  It's very quick using MS Office. Bug i119091
>> was
>> > raised for it. I checked the bugzilla, seems it is one known issue.
>> >
>> > *Defects Summary*:
>> > So far 360 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and 3.4m0. If we count
>> > the defects from 1th Aug. of last year, it means the about date we call
>> > "AOO 3.4", the total defects number is 271.
>> > Among the 360 defects, 51 critical defects raised and 17 ones remain
>> > opening now.
>> > One great news is currently we only have 3 reamining release blockers and
>> > two of them need be discussed:
>> >   D<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_id&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Sev▲<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_severity%20DESC%2Cpriority%2C&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Pri▲<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=priority%20DESC%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > OS<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=op_sys%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Assignee<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=assigned_to%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Status<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_status%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Resolution<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=resolution%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > Summary<
>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=short_desc%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker
>> >
>> > 118895 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895>  cri  P3
>>  All
>> > jsc@apache.org  CONF  ---  aoo3.4 r1240836: some contextmenu entries are
>> > not localized <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895>
>> > 119082 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119082>  cri  P3
>>  All
>> > ooo-issues@incubator.apache...  CONF  ---  hidden section - crash when
>> > pressing F9 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119082>
>> > 119090<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090>  nor
>> >  P3  All  issues@security.openoffice.org  CONF  ---  Default Encryption
>> > Fails for Down-Level Implementations
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090>  3 bugs found.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 24 defects raised in this week,and 14 defects closed.
>> >
>> > Based on previous testing and my daily usage on AOO 3.4, so far we can
>> say
>> > that:
>> > The stability is ok.
>> > The interoperability with MS Office seems fine.
>> > The basic functions work fine.
>> >
>> > But the accessibility, globalizaiton may have some problems. The general
>> > testing in community focus on installability, basic fucntions,
>> > interoperability, extension etc.
>> >
>> > *Risk:
>> > *The high risk for AOO 3.4 is during the migration from OO to AOO, many
>> > test cases lost and no one large automation suite can be used for
>> > regression testing now. So again I appreciate and thakns for everyone's
>> > contribution to QA works.
>> > If you have interesting in QA work and decide to contribute to it, please
>> > go to AOO 3.4 main page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA.
>> > Get dev build from:
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
>> > Write your case by edit this page:
>> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/
>> > And place your result:
>> > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestResults
>> > Or you may just do general testing based on your usage without test cases
>> > or testing result and just raise defects in Bugzilla directly:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
>> > Any contribution is welcome and can contribute to this project's success!
>> >
>> > Besides, I created entry for project reporting on below wiki:
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting
>> >
>> > Uner it, you can get detail AOO 3.4 QA weekly status reports from this
>> page:
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+QA+Status+Report
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> >
>> > Lily
>>

Mime
View raw message