openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <>
Subject RE: Proposal: The ODF Commons
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:18:36 GMT

Are you suggesting that extensions, the format of .oxt files, and the means by which extensions
can integrate into operation of an ODF processor should be the subject of the ODF specification
or some other interoperability agreement?

At the moment it is all under whatever variations arise as part of
Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice divergence.

 - Dennis

PS: I believe consolidated/federated repositories with a common catalog identifying extensions,
what they work with, platform requirements, licensing, and packaging is intended as part of
the evolution of the extensions and templates service, along with reliance on SourceForge
as a friendly host.

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Suárez-Potts [] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:10
To: ooo-dev@incubator
Subject: Proposal: The ODF Commons

[ ... ]

This led to the obvious conclusion--at least, obvious to me: provided
license permits, I'd think that it makes sense to have a single site
for extensions that would work with all (or as many as…) ODF
implementations. The site could be a list of links, as I had for the
old OOo support page. But I'd rather hope that it would be more than
that, and be a commons we could all benefit from.

I have no illusion that this will come about anytime soon (or that it
even ought to). However, my interest lies in making ODF (note, I
wrote, "ODF") more usable and more obviously usable now and later for
the tens of millions--billions, soon enough--wanting to use the app.
And one thing that they will want is extensions. I know I did.

How to proceed?

Well, a discussion on the matter is always a good place to start. But
it would also be good to have a clear understanding of the obstacles,
of whatever nature, lie in waiting.

Note, this is not at all about consolidating the split communities.
That's up to the developers and the teams and the people involved.

Nor is this proposal about taking advantage of LibreOffice's
extensions because the ones I wanted two nights ago were not current
on the old OOo site. No, I expect that repository to be updated quite
soon and to be stocked with interesting work as the Apache effort
gains the attention it merits and appeals to enterprise users as well
as consumers. (And as a strong supporter of the project of which I am
a member, I will do what I can to further this podling's progress.)

Rather, this is about making it easier for users to access those
things they want and for developers to reach communities and markets
that want them. And I see a page that concentrates information a
useful step.


View raw message