Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4EEF3017.9040904@a-w-f.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:37:43 +0100
From: Andre Fischer <af@a-w-f.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: GStreamer not optional
References: <20111217041452.BE1F3C00F2@aegis.apache.org>
 <20111217161330.GB4701@localhost> <4EECC773.6080404@oracle.com>
 <20111217170000.GC4701@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20111217170000.GC4701@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On 17.12.2011 18:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:46:43AM -0800, Andrew Rist wrote:
>> On 12/17/2011 8:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 04:14:52AM +0000, buildbot@apache.org wrote:
>>>> The Buildbot has finished a build on builder openofficeorg-nightly while building ASF Buildbot.
>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>>   http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/41
>>>>
>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>>>>
>>>> Buildslave for this Build: tethys_ubuntu
>>>>
>>>> Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'openofficeorgNightly' triggered this build
>>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch incubator/ooo/trunk] HEAD
>>>> Blamelist:
>>>>
>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_2
>>>>
>>>> sincerely,
>>>>   -The Buildbot
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/41/steps/compile_2/logs/stdio
>>> checking whether to build the GStreamer media backend... checking for
>>> GSTREAMER... no
>>> configure: error: requirements to build the GStreamer media backend not
>>> met. Use --disable-gstreamer or install the missing packages
>>> program finished with exit code 1
>> Why did this just happen now?  What has changed?
>> We have had many successful builds over the last few weeks, and the
>> machine setup has not changed.
>> Is this due to the category_b change?
>
> yes

I am sorry about this, but can you elaborate the connection?

-Andre

> [...]