openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrea Pescetti <>
Subject Re: Accepting WhiteLabel Office Bug Reports?
Date Mon, 26 Dec 2011 20:47:29 GMT
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I notice that a bugzilla report on WhiteLabel Office 3.3.1 was received and
> closed as invalid: <>.
> ... Can it be found in our hearts to accepts these and be gentler with them and
> the users who go to the trouble to submit them?

WhiteLabel Office 3.3.1 does not exist. A release candidate is by no 
means a final release and it is only meant for testing; this is another 
of the details that the press release did not stress 

> Clearly, there are TOO folks who could handle them if they are WLO-only
> defects.

Sure, but release candidates should be announced properly (i.e., not 
with a widely circulated press release).

My proposal would be to add a keyword named "external" to BugZilla and 
tag all related reports with it, and then at due time close all open 
issues with that keyword as "Invalid" (if indeed White Label Office 
3.3.1 is released as a separate product) or deal with them (if something 
special happens and White Label Office 3.3.1 is released with a proper 
name, proper QA and proper collaboration).


View raw message