Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of olivier.noreply@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4EB7EC51.105@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:33:53 +0100
From: "Olivier R." <olivier.noreply@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hunspell dictionaries are not just words lists (+ other matters)
References: <4EB7BB6C.10304@gmail.com>
 <CAP-ksoj34U+GWN8N0ZwDsXYq84t0n82ndKC6NPssXxCxyJR-rA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4EB7D5E0.2010201@gmail.com>
 <CAP-ksogETdkN-uprJ-X8ahpXNXn-68FMDOCqb=G00S_q_=EfMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksogETdkN-uprJ-X8ahpXNXn-68FMDOCqb=G00S_q_=EfMg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Le 07/11/2011 14:13, Rob Weir a écrit :

> I said something slightly different.  I said we should respect the
> author's intentions/wishes, regardless of the copyright.  In other
> words, even if they made something available under an Apache 2.0
> license, if the author came to us and said, "I really don't want you
> to use my library", then we should respect that.  Of course, this is
> within reason.

Thanks for clarifying.


Now, I am eager to know if Apache Foundation also states that 
dictionaries authors cannot claim to have any copyright on their work.


Regards,
Olivier