Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7B3C7B22 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62777 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2011 15:38:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62739 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2011 15:38:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62731 invoked by uid 99); 13 Nov 2011 15:38:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:38:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ariel.constenla.haile@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:38:47 +0000 Received: by ywt2 with SMTP id 2so2609577ywt.6 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:38:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qyMQB+H+8egJ+lsBN3PfR9dEPR155hbP+PH81HzEFjg=; b=PTEUQIZ4vpneuHclJU5pdN0Ua0lMblJsZOGtgKRblFqfgP41NSeWwxLdCyEKOwwxdR HOLW1wT2wHgvtZ2hUYye/rVVEqWYS2pHE+8Z+h5hD6FRYcAmkf3TNkLY2vr6wW6X9GNA rHXNvRKWg93W2EZqAd0HzqdtOajd5KmMRbVvA= Received: by 10.236.178.9 with SMTP id e9mr8751485yhm.77.1321198706038; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:38:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([190.190.208.101]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm10868231yhm.7.2011.11.13.07.38.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:38:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:40:10 -0300 From: Ariel Constenla-Haile To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: GPL'd dictionaries (was Re: ftp.services.openoffice.org?) Message-ID: <20111113154010.GA21795@localhost> References: <20111108012556.GB7399@localhost> <1320717649.59072.YahooMailClassic@web113508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <20111108024047.GC7399@localhost> <4EBC5BBE.60607@openoffice.org> <4EBEE140.5000007@openoffice.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EBEE140.5000007@openoffice.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:12:32PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 11/11/2011 RGB ES wrote: > >2011/11/11 Andrea Pescetti > >>Excluding dictionaries from builds would result in confused/enraged use= rs > >>unless there is a way to make dictionary installation so smooth ... > >Yes, except that OOo builds did never distribute dictionaries outside > >English, French and Italian (the Spanish dictionary was so useless that = do > >not count!): for most of AOOo users all around the world, the need to > >download dictionaries and install them "by hand" will not be a new > >experience. >=20 > Really? Honestly, you might be right, since I actually never tried > to download the, say, Swedish build and check if it included a > Swedish dictionary; I just assumed it did. >=20 > But I just checked and if I download the Swedish version > http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/localized/sv/3.3.0/OOo_3.3.= 0_Linux_x86_install-rpm-wJRE_sv.tar.gz > the package contains openoffice.org3-dict-sv-3.3.0-9567.i586.rpm > which in turn contains sv_SE.dic ; now, either I was just lucky (I > picked a language at random) or we did (we do) distribute > dictionaries in the localized versions of OpenOffice.org. Ricardo was surely talking about the Spanish dictionaries. You can get an idea about what was distributed with the langpacks by browsing http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/dictionaries/ If you look at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ooo/trunk/main/dictionaries/es_ES/ only the spelling dict. was distributed (no hyph. nor thes.). A rough analysis http://people.apache.org/~arielch/dictionaries.ods shows that more than half language packs didn't distribute the three DICT,= =20 HYPHEN and THES dics.=20 Regards --=20 Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOv+TZAAoJEMjP1bm45QNWWhwP/AmWHtJ/+eJ+xKUxaA6GFUzk khcztDCbsRtCYO4xDC9uRNfjtSdCg7sMq20KnYiS+BNR92LbMX9oc0uaU4PWdKvX Q3fwY0OOFF2j936Ra8FX/3UyTKzphn452TjBA22V5zG1G43LuyeCEc+wybbZl52v oph4g8fX9VlFnoFFfiQGWVrFo1OjmryMCobuB1OAXiNWULL3ukANilNAtI8JuBMr AItD+l/Oa6HekIvyCLfclKAA0noIDO+R3d1MhQK1Kv/xvkIGbwo7fHT0m6eXItYX 7BNlIQ+JpGWELvCgJqprmzgOTYwrxLYD5G1VLcRTBmLCdXzS2QGPFyaI8d6f2X0c mLWhz8uR7JjpYuaeChYuAKbPYfKv81hyVc0z7D2ILzOgICMdBWOYh+z21DgoQbiQ +DzYMfkBTTXu0EOWGU7RhsO6sAH+e+9MaxW5/jDPyTqusrD54KYEjID9OStJ/KR6 PgDCFeV/QV0DJfAYQUotslnF57BrgKlnhuHBxQNaM/09FWVGgBb6VaNcJkkQvitT CGnCjmFwtRnjtSa7GFzdHAf77HxQKQeJqd3Y3Giq/u2aHpyDCS3dam6mdj3qvWzn HSl2CeLnNrP6KFGoLEJ6v272oYg49uvK/2mKyv4ErkylSwQLYHitU8FVegEwgnwF LXNmtODxb/1dq8MXX/OE =DoCr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--