Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <1322166720.3664.YahooMailClassic@web113515.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:32:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>
Reply-To: pfg@apache.org
Subject: Re: GPL'd dictionaries (was Re: ftp.services.openoffice.org?)
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <1652DA49-7EB1-4660-AFB4-6DE700BED907@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

+1

I think it's simple enough. We can make life
more difficult after 3.4.

Still the italian dictionary is GPL only.

--- On Thu, 11/24/11, Mathias Bauer <mathias_bauer@gmx.net> wrote:

> 
> Am 24.11.2011 um 20:46 schrieb Pedro Giffuni <pfg@apache.org>:
> 
> > Hi Mathias;
> > 
> > --- On Thu, 11/24/11, Mathias Bauer <mathias_bauer@gmx.net>
> wrote:
> > 
> >>> 
> >>> You mean like just tar them all and put them
> with the
> >> binary
> >>> release?
> >> 
> >> Yes. Even packaging as extension and deploying
> these
> >> packages as part of a binary release does not
> look
> >> fundamentally different than bundling a library.
> >> 
> > 
> > I think this is a perfectly viable solution.
> > 
> > The only issue is what type of maintenance are
> > we planning to do on this. I had suggested
> > Apache Extras as a point of encounter for
> > contributors as we can't maintain this directly,
> > but perhaps this is something that doesn't get
> > updated very much or perhaps the real maintainers
> > can handle this on their own (as extensions).
> > 
> > Pedro.
> 
> We don't need to change the dic files, we just take them as
> they are
> > 
> > 
> >> Regards,
> >> Mathias
> >> 
> >>>> 
> >> 
>