openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gianluca Turconi <>
Subject Re: GPL'd dictionaries (was Re:
Date Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:15:22 GMT
Pedro Giffuni ha scritto:
> Copyleft imposes restrictions on software and when you
> try to impose your "freedoms" to other people, the result
> ends up being less free. We respect copyleft, but we want
> more.
Well, I understand your point.

I created a new dictionary from scratch because the author of the 
original ispell Italian dictionary didn't want to change its license to 
something compatible with OOo licenses.

However, I thought it was like reinventing the wheel and I feel in the 
same way this time too.
> Being pragmatical I think for 3.4 we will ship with
> hunspell binaries of the available dictionaries, just
> like LibreOffice does. We still cannot ship the existing
> italian dictionary because of the GPL. It is not illegal
> to do it but ASF's policies apply here so someone outside
> the ASF will have to do it.
Well, it would be useful to know how the compiling and releasing 
structure of the AOOo *binaries* will work, in order to know who may or 
may not do that work.

Will the binaries be *official* or *contributed* by volunteers of an 
external compiling farm?



Lettura gratuita o acquisto di libri e racconti di fantascienza,
fantasy, horror, noir, narrativa fantastica e tradizionale:

View raw message