Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CD608FCD for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23928 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 00:01:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23843 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 00:01:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23835 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2011 00:01:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:01:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mrichards@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.173] (HELO mail-ey0-f173.google.com) (209.85.215.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:01:15 +0000 Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so3939659eyb.18 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:00:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=1vgstuVC0KzPfjw70e1DPcDkDqORdfteYiIxXabHcqg=; b=Lln7Yp29lvo2CEnczMHzXhVAcTWcs1IL12ycRfhkz4A+WCUAvxbAvdwW7f24YxaMZO aafRTdDMa5mzJMdAwOLjvThfEdbOXBuwH+xMi8bCH0buSVLC+4PBRZAAZxWTFsZtZxIL IVEnZVad/WLuXtvsV4Wy7pYW7Br+4gIwaPspg= Received: by 10.213.15.139 with SMTP id k11mr456812eba.129.1315267255174; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:00:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.20.83 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:00:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <013a01cc6c12$4f7d88e0$ee789aa0$@acm.org> References: <013a01cc6c12$4f7d88e0$ee789aa0$@acm.org> From: Matt Richards Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 19:00:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build OpenOffice?) To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, dennis.hamilton@acm.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bee2c87884804ac3a8573 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174bee2c87884804ac3a8573 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 One lurking question (suppose its also a decision) is content wise is there a plan to transition the content on the current OO.org wiki over to confluence? I'm gathering there are some licensing/community related issues with doing so. But it seems kind of redundant/confusing to have two wikis for one project. I thought OOOUsers would contain similar information to what is now on the OpenOffice.org wiki? On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > [I am *intentionally* breaking this thread off of the building OOo one] > > The OpenOffice.org wiki version reachable on Apache OOo is a test instance > and has not been kept synchronized with the OpenOffice.org "master" as far > as I know. Changes there will be lost when we do a production cut-over. > (We have not staged a cut-over and staging is not defined yet.) It is a > MediaWiki though. > > If you have updates that would work on the OpenOffice.org instance, I > recommend that you make them there. > > If you want to help with the definition and staging of the cut-over, it > might be useful to record your thoughts on OOOUSER in conjunction with Kay > Schenk's matrix at M > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OOo-to-ASF-site-recommendation > >. > > Finally, at the hands-on level, I believe Terry would welcome more > assistance. > > You wouldn't happen to know how to administer and preserve the OO.o Mailing > List system would you? [Private joke [;<) but I wish it weren't] > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Richards [mailto:mrichards@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 13:49 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Who wants to build OpenOffice? > > Now that I've built OpenOffice on Linux with moderate success, I'd like to > lend a helping hand with the documentation side of things. As far as I am > aware, the existing (maybe old now) wiki has been migrated to Apache Infra > (via VM). Does this content need to be moved to the confluence wikis > eventually? I do apologies if this is off topic, there's been so much > discussion going on proving difficult to follow everything all the way > through. > > -- --Matt --0015174bee2c87884804ac3a8573--