Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2871D9DBE for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9982 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2011 15:48:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9942 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2011 15:48:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9933 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2011 15:48:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:48:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jogischmidt@googlemail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:48:36 +0000 Received: by bke11 with SMTP id 11so7257498bke.6 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:48:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DKPyn3EmNk7BCQMBg8eHm87RbqDrInmT3bxP1Nwhmzg=; b=M7WW5kqu8y4DbtwPAGeFZkgBTfm6ugIjdA9OzwZ3wIegd7QB7MWByXNM9PTNMSoie+ s7Kl/Lx0U0J1doqy6G6c6FPaOrGGWFY4LqwAX2z4bkF+a36aFQxImfRkeqnfdP15SXgT gT+3Ul6J+nHMleylVk2SvUNS9/YX6fVG1CfPY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.132.9 with SMTP id z9mr5266378bks.333.1317138495938; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.141.75 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:48:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E81E2F5.50102@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:48:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch] Removal of Windows build requirement on unicows.dll - issue 88652 From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCrgen_Schmidt?= To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151744836a2b9f8304adee3453 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151744836a2b9f8304adee3453 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Is anyone else building on Windows right now? > > If not, we have a logistical problem. Oliver is not a committer, but > he is producing a good number of patches for the Windows build that no > one else seems to be testing and integrating. > > I can think of two ways of solving this problem. > > i am building on windows as well at the moment but have more or less the same configuration as Oliver and i was waiting for somebody else with a different system who would test it. I will test it tomorrow. Juergen > -Rob > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have created a patch to remove the Window build requirement on > unicows.dll > > - see issue 88652 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=88652 > > The patch contains already the patch which cmc@openoffice.org (Caolan > > McNamara) has provided and attached to this issue. > > > > Can someone please review and test the patch and commit it to the > > reprository. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Oliver. > > > --00151744836a2b9f8304adee3453--