Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16CDD72E8 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59158 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 19:02:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59007 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2011 19:02:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58998 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2011 19:02:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:02:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.233.128.45] (HELO mail3.vodafone.ie) (213.233.128.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:02:44 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmYGAF9tZk5tTCQk/2dsb2JhbABDmRyOZHiBRgEBBTpPCAMNCxYYVxmHdblXg18Mgn8EmFuLYQ Received: from unknown (HELO 100AkerWood) ([109.76.36.36]) by mail3.vodafone.ie with SMTP; 06 Sep 2011 20:02:24 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:02:23 +0100 From: Rory O'Farrell To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Forum integration Message-Id: <20110906200223.6ab69b86e7cec31421961fb5@iol.ie> In-Reply-To: References: <1315332955.1994.81.camel@sybil> <1315333192.1994.82.camel@sybil> <175E6A2F-FFA5-4AF0-9968-8FD7A5FD94B9@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.24.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:51:36 -0400 Rob Weir wrote: > If anyone can explain better "Volunteers", that would be great. Do > they have any extra rights? Or is it just the case that some of what > Apache would call "contributors" are given the title "Volunteer" while > other, perhaps less active contributors are not given that title? Volunteers get a different colour code on the Forum User Name and a tag saying that they are Volunteers. In addition, they get read only access to the Delete thread so they can monitor what is being held in the three day delete period, and read/write access to the Forum issues and Governance threads so that they can raise questions which are visible to the other Volunteers/Mods etc. Because they have reached a "trusted" status, their opinions may receive more weight with other Volunteers/Mods than those of the random User. -- Rory O'Farrell