openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Richards <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build OpenOffice?)
Date Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:35 GMT
One lurking question (suppose its also a decision) is content wise is there
a plan to transition the content on the current wiki over
to confluence? I'm gathering there are some licensing/community related
issues with doing so. But it seems kind of redundant/confusing to have two
wikis for one project. I thought OOOUsers would contain similar information
to what is now on the wiki?

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton

> [I am *intentionally* breaking this thread off of the building OOo one]
> The wiki version reachable on Apache OOo is a test instance
> and has not been kept synchronized with the "master" as far
> as I know.  Changes there will be lost when we do a production cut-over.
>  (We have not staged a cut-over and staging is not defined yet.)  It is a
> MediaWiki though.
> If you have updates that would work on the instance, I
> recommend that you make them there.
> If you want to help with the definition and staging of the cut-over, it
> might be useful to record your thoughts on OOOUSER in conjunction with Kay
> Schenk's matrix at M
> >.
> Finally, at the hands-on level, I believe Terry would welcome more
> assistance.
> You wouldn't happen to know how to administer and preserve the OO.o Mailing
> List system would you? [Private joke [;<) but I wish it weren't]
>  - Dennis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Richards []
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 13:49
> To:
> Subject: Re: Who wants to build OpenOffice?
> Now that I've built OpenOffice on Linux with moderate success, I'd like to
> lend a helping hand with the documentation side of things. As far as I am
> aware, the existing (maybe old now) wiki has been migrated to Apache Infra
> (via VM). Does this content need to be moved to the confluence wikis
> eventually? I do apologies if this is off topic, there's been so much
> discussion going on proving difficult to follow everything all the way
> through.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message