openoffice-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shane Curcuru <>
Subject Re: [email] email / user transition
Date Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:54:09 GMT
On 8/12/2011 2:27 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Dave Fisher<>
>> wrote:
>>> (2) registered users.
>>> Should we have a way to maintain email aliases? Who do
>>> we do this for?
> Yes Dave, it is important to save those aliases. On the users side, the
> e-mail addresses were a little but nice strategic
> element in community building. On the practical side, the
> alias was/is used as the username in Bugzilla, in other
> sites belonging to the infrastructure (QATrack and at
> least one of Templates and Extensions); password recovery messages and
> Bugzilla notifications are sent to those aliases.
> Of course, this could be fixed by scripting, but it might be (but I
> couldn't check the real code) that some services rely on the identity
> "e-mail address for user USERNAME ="; and these
> would be broken.

Personally, I do not see how (policy-wise) that we'd continue to 
maintain any non-official or non-committer email accounts at the domain in the future.  But this is a larger issue that 
could use it's own thread.  Apache provides basic email addresses (not 
necessarily mail storage) only for committers, typically, so potentially 
extending (or, keeping) email addresses to a much larger body of 
non-committers requires real thought.

I understand the issue of maintaining logins to existing systems where 
practical, but I would urge the team to consider focusing instead on how 
any new (or migrated) Apache OOo bugtrackers, forums, etc. would work 
instead of figuring out how to maintain every bit of old functionality 
from past OOo sites.

>> The problem we're going to run into is that there are both official
>> email addresses, like,
>>, And then there are user
>> accounts at the same domain, given out rather freely.
> This remark by Rob Weir is absolutely true, unfortunately. And what's
> worse is that, as far as I know, there is no way to discriminate between
> "official" and "personal" addresses. Several years ago, the Italian N-L
> project created an alias (means "schools") for a
> -never properly launched- project about in Italian
> schools. And this was registered by merely "squatting" a free address
> since we knew no way to officially reserve an alias, and I suspect that
> the other "official" aliases you list could have been registered this
> way as well.

I would suggest (roughly), figuring out a migration for any important 
system email addresses/accounts (hostmaster@, webmaster@, whatever) and 
Apache committer's accounts, and then plan at some announced date to 
turn off email features for all other oo.o email addresses.  If 
necessary, the PPMC could decide - if contacted by existing account 
holders who have been active and productive - to re-enable selected 
email accounts on a one-by-one decision basis.

In my Branding view, the PPMC will need to address and remove any of 
these email or domain squatters.  It is not acceptable to allow 
non-community members to squat or make use of official ASF domain names 
or services.  But we do have time to discuss how to do this.

> Regards,
> Andrea.

- Shane

View raw message